Cethin

Yeah, absolutely. It specifically says “a well regulated militia.” It meant militias could keep armories of weapons for their members to use. It didn’t mean every random person would have one at their house. If they meant citizens being armed they would have written that.

Defenestration? In this economy? Windows are to expensive to waste on Fascists. Let’s use something more environmentally and economically friendly and reusable.

Yeah, it doesn’t though. The second amendment says nothing like that. It says militias can have weapons to defend the state from enemies. It does not say citizens can fight tyrants controlling the state, despite what a lot of media would lead you to believe.

It’s really short. Read it, and read it critically. Don’t try to read what you’ve already been told.

Some of our founders wrote and spoke about fighting tyrants, but there’s not like a constitutional protection for it or anything like that.

Like the other comment says, players build cities. A quick search says there are 81 cities with over 5m people each in the world. Most city builders we’re building at the scale of these large cities, so that means over 81 players would be over the population we have in the real world. If there are thousands of players, yeah, it’s going to get tight. If there are tens of thousands, there’s not enough space.

It was exploited. That’s how they proved it worked. They just didn’t exploit it to do anything nefarious.

There is an argument to be made that having secure high paying government jobs harms other sectors by taking employees and raising average pay, forcing them to keep up. We aren’t anywhere near that being an issue though, but there is a limit where more government jobs can make recovery harder, when other sectors go out of business competing with it and there’s nowhere for anyone to go once the government jobs close.

Basically Dutch Disease.

This wouldn’t be “defending it” like a copyright claim. This would be suing for damages. It doesn’t matter how much they care about the brand. They’d sue to get money based on a loss of potential sales (future and present) and any other harm done.

I could see them not wanting to rock the boat, but I don’t think it’s a smart play. They’ll go down either way if the Fascists want, and they clearly don’t care about them enough to not damage them.

The MAGA base does actually care about pedophilia. They’ve been told it’s trans people committing it though. If they see evidence that it’s the elite, in particular Trump, then some will flip, or at least lose interest. Assuming we have elections in the future (even local will be useful), this is something we should push.

Don’t expect it to lead to immediate consequences. I don’t think anyone expects that. Expect it to lead to them losing control of some of their base.

If they can take something like “woke” and use it to mean something bad, we can take infowars and use it for something good (and correct/accurate). Make that usage of the word the default when people hear it, not the other thing.

I would argue this is a politics community. Sure, it’s focus is on absurd stories, but it’s still political. Just saying some stories are absurd is political.

DC2 is still fairly similar with the dungeons (though much less grindy, and far less annoying with running out of water or whatever, from my memory). 2 adds a ton of other things to do though. If you’re tired of grinding dungeons, go fishing, breed your fish for races and events, go golfing, find things to take pictures of for inventing, progress your town for more unlocks, advance NPC quests to add them to your group, etc. 1 is fairly linear with one way to progress. 2 has probably a dozen different activities to progress in, so you can do whatever you want in the moment.

From my memory, the misable stuff isn’t the important, but it is frustrating to not be able to get. I would say if you aren’t worried about missing a few unlocks, just accept that you’ll miss stuff and don’t stress about it.

If you’re the type of person (like me) who finds out they missed something and feel compelled to restart, even if you were never planning on 100% the game, then yeah, use a guide. I wouldn’t use a guide for everything, but I’m certain there are guides that say when misable stuff is coming and how to get them.

With MS especially.

Man, I hate these maps. Sure, it’s still shaped like the US, but the states are in totally incorrect places. For example, VA is three states in on this map. Functionality is more important than esthetics.

I don’t think the comment above is talking about GamePass specifically. They’re talking about the “I’ve been an Xbox customer since…” stuff. That kind of corporate loyalty is a scam. You never should buy a product because you owned the previous one. Do what’s best for you when it’s best for you. Don’t give them any loyalty. Make them earn your purchase.

I don’t think that’s why. I think it’s just because it’s cheaper. My school had communal showers, but we didn’t use them (sports teams did though). The inky ones I ever used were at Boy Scout camps. I’m pretty sure it’s because it used to not be considered a big deal, and it’s saves a lot of money. Honestly, I think it’s an issue it has become such a big issue. Most countries aren’t so uptight about nudity. It’s an American thing to be scared of nudity.

So my school, back in the day, had communal showers, but we weren’t required to use them. We had to change in a communal area, but only down to our underwear. Though occasionally in Boy Scouts we did have to use communal showers.

Now apparently this school doesn’t require kids to change at all. Honestly, that’s nasty. Anyone who’s been around teenagers knows they’re nasty and sweaty normally, but after gym it’s obviously worse. The solution should have been to create private areas or something, not to have them not change clothes at all, so they walk around the rest of the day all nasty.

In my opinion though, communal changing isn’t a bad thing. It can actually be good. America already has a weird issue with nudity, and getting rid of the one place where that was slightly challenged I don’t think is beneficial in the long run. Short term it’s nice, but long term I think it might do more harm than good. Instead we should be trying to make people feel comfortable with who they are, not scared of it. Yeah, it’s got some issues, but I think the bad outweighs the good.

Yeah, this needs to be praised or they’ll just decide it’s never worth appeasing the left. You don’t need to say they’re a great company or anything, but this is a good move. If they see that they give this up and get nothing in return then guess what they’ll do next time? Absolutely nothing, or maybe shift to the right where they’ll actually be rewarded.

Yep, they get your ID and can associate your account and activity to your person. These are always anti-privacy laws, not “protect the children” laws. That’s just what they say to get people to give up their freedoms.