That little unsolicited remark about Microsoft’s valuation at the bottom is clearly the result of smoking too much copium by the biased author.
The response to him by Starman that it’s only about IIS is false and completely missing the point BaldProphet made. Which is what I showed with the quote from the article.
That’s exactly it.
As BaldProphet wrote above:
The response to him by Starman that it’s only about IIS is false and completely missing the point BaldProphet made. Which is what I showed with the quote from the article.