When I refer to Linux, I am referring to a computer with the kernel and other software that makes up a Personal Computer.
I like to think that Linux is great, and always will be, a Personal Computer. Windows, I will always remember it being the best thing for business’s as Microsoft pushes licenses and such business related features.
I switched to Linux in 2020, Ubuntu, and slowly learned my ways around, and understanding how everything works, but most people don’t have to now, it’s so simple to get started.
Linux: Gimp
Windows: Photoshop
Gimp is available on Windows.
Linux: Libre Office
Windows: MS Office
Libre Office is also available on Windows.
this is quite frankly, a really dumb picture that is wrong on many accounts
Looks like something an underpaid school teacher would whip up
Windows isn’t / doesn’t use a microkernel
“Free software” doesn’t mean you don’t pay for it, but that it respects and preserves the user’s freedom. The opposite is not “cost software” but unfree software.
Most of the other points in this list are also questionable or inaccurate. In fact, I think the only true one is the first one: open source vs closed source.
Though it is also true that Linux is gratis and Windows is not.
Not really:
-
RHEL is paid if you need more devices than the free license provides
-
SEL and Ubuntu Pro don’t have any free licenses as far as I remember
-
you can mostly use windows without paying anything
It seems kind of disingenuous to compare enterprise support contracts for Linux to personal Windows licenses. Especially while also ignoring that you do pay for Windows, it’s just hidden in the cost of the device.
-
Yeah, in fact. The Linux kernel does use proprietary software (Blobs) for it to run. Or stuff to function like Bluetooth and shit like that.
Idk, just a Twitter post I found.
I would argue that Linux is not more secure than Windows. Linux is way more private and gives you way more control but from a purely security perspective Linux has its own weaknesses and is constantly getting CVEs.
I don’t think getting CVE’s is a good metric for security strength, but good points aside.
I don’t think Linux is inherently insecure. I just think it does have its own security issues which is especially true of LTS. It isn’t a golden nugget and it is problematic when people treat it as such.
Gimp runs in windows. The security thing isn’t really true (X11 isn’t secure and it can’t be fixed apparently)
In fact, as others have said, really bad comparison…
X11 isn’t secure and it can’t be fixed apparently
Which is why so much work has been going into Wayland, which will replace X11.
Yeah. And honestly, way land already works fine (even screen sharing). Waydroid is a bit of a killer app too (but needs more refinement,).
i mean gimp and libre office are both downloadable from winget and windows is typically free or factored in when you buy a pc (which is how most people would get it)
I don’t think Windows uses a microkernel. Hybrid kernel is the term I’ve heard used.
DAE micro$haft winBLOW$ suxx???
Your ability to ride the fence is admirable OP, don’t let anyone take it from you 🙏
Administrator is not root. NT AUTHORIRY\System probably comes closest. You rarely need to interact with that account because Window’s security system doesn’t have the same mix of authentication systems most Linux systems have (users + container APIs + PolKit).
Windows also supports mixed case filesystems just fine. It’s not the default, so your programs will probably screw up, but it’s just a flag. You can also mount filesystems like ext4 and btrfs on Windows (though booting from them doesn’t really work).
Also, Windows runs Libreoffice and GIMP just fine. You don’t need to, because you have better sofware available (pirated or paid).
As for security, Windows is MUCH better unless you’re a cybersecurity specialist with too much time in their hands. Most major distros don’t even come with a firewall enabled by default, let alone a firewall for outgoing traffic. And the best AV I’ve seen for Linux is Microsoft’s enterprise version of Windows defender. In terms of hacking tools, they’re mostly written in languages Python, most of them work on either platform.
For development, Linux has a slight edge, but with WSL2 it really doesn’t matter much.
Using Windows I can tolerate most of their shit. But their Administor stuff and security model in general…
This might be one of the worse infographics I’ve ever laid my eyes on
Was probably made by a child as a school project. At least I hope.
Methinks it might be engagement bait
A child as a school project using ChatGPT
“Provides more security than windows”
This is the only one I seriously doubt.
Ms defender is actually something I wish we had a replacement for.
Read only root fs is a start, but it doesn’t protect my documents.
Like your linux doesn’t get hacked because no one cares, if we become a target we are helpless more or less.
This is the only one I seriously doubt.
Really? Almost all of it is wrong.
And there are still people who will downvote you for saying that Linux distros are not impregnable fortresses of OS security
Oooh, I get to say an “Umm… Actually” fact. File names are not case sensitive in Linux nor are they case insensitive in Windows.
It’s entirely possible to have a case insensitive filesystem on Linux (I think ext4 supports a mount option for it now). Likewise, there’s a bit you can set on folders in Windows that makes its contents case sensitive. So realistically, case sensitivity is a property of the folder, not the OS.
Yes, that’s as annoying as it sounds.
I hate the fact that if you want to change the case on a file in windows, you can’t just replace the offending letter. You have to change the name completely, then change it back with the correct casing. Then Windows will finally keep it.
