• TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      10 months ago

      Now corporations start with that bulshit of “oh, that model wasn’t sustainable actually” even though it worked perfectly fine for the last decade and they still get record profits year after year. They keep ripping everything from under us, this gotta stop.

      • TipRing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s not enough to make money, they have to make all the money. They have a requirement for perpetual growth.

        • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes, which is impossible in a world with finite resources. Utter madness.

          Attempting to squeeze more money out of everything is only making the world worse. Everything is disposable, service-bound and overmonetized, and they keep pushing more and more ads and psychological trickery at us to try to sell it.

  • Tosti@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    10 months ago

    The moment each show got a pre-reel for another Amazon show this was clearly the path they where taking.

    Already cancelled a good 6 months ago.

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    “We aim to have meaningfully fewer ads than linear TV and other streaming TV providers. No action is required from you, and there is no change to the current price of your Prime membership,”

    The double-speak is relatively subtle, but it’s always interesting to see how much work they put into gaslighting their customers:

    • “No action is required from you…” - yes, Amazon hopes we do nothing, but Amazon unilaterally changed the assumptions underlying agreement, so “no action” is an acquiescence to a materially worse reality for us and a better one for Amazon.
    • “…there is no change to the current price of your Prime membership” - yes, no additional dollars are required because Amazon is now selling our time and attention, but that is still a new “fee” we are paying.

    Pretty gross, Amazon.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        until profit margins improve

        Lol

        What is this mythical profit margin/amount that companies would be willing to accept? There is no limit to corporate greed…

  • chitak166@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The mods removed my comment with a link to a great free streaming site with the reason “don’t link directly to pirated content.” (great censorship!)

    I don’t see that in the rules, so I guess it’s one of those “mystery” rules they can just make up on the spot.

    Anyways, you can find free streaming sites here: https://rentry.co/megathread-movies-and-tv#streaming

    I recommend using fmovies. Make sure you have Adnauseam or uBlock Origin installed.

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    streaming has absolutely no future. if they keep pulling shit like this it’s going to decline even faster. i suppose it’s more about sucking off advertisers than it is pleasing customers, too…if you’re going to fail anyway why can’t you at least make a positive difference in the world?

      • wagoner@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It will be like the Netflix exodus, the reddit exodus, etc. They’ll make more money. The best you can do is be true to yourself and not participate if you don’t want to.

        • gorogorochan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          10 months ago

          Sadly, this. Average consumer, and I don’t mean it as an insult, will not look for an alternative to streaming. All these giant streaming companies are gauging how far they can go to increase the profit margins.

          • JonEFive@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I’m a technically savvy average consumer. I’ve just been accepting the enshitification. It feels like every month a different company is raising prices.

            I’m about ready to put on an eye patch and fly the Jolly Roger at this point.

    • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      My prediction is that it all goes back to Netflix when they decide it’s not worth the time and expense to run their own services. They had a nice passive income thing going on there for many years and can have it again if they just license their IP again.

    • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      streaming has absolutely no future.

      Streaming isn’t going anywhere, and if anything will likely continue to grow for as cable dies off. It’s just going to consolidate and get shittier (ads) as basically things move back to a model more cable-like. Piracy will probably ramp back to like levels for music in the early 2000’s, but it will remain a niche. Amazon specifically will see blowback for this, but it’s unlikely to move many off of Prime since it’s sort of a tertiary benefit to having a Prime membership, and even if it’s all you got for your Prime membership, it’s still one of the cheapest streaming services.

    • Zevlen@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      We need open source streaming or something… Ya kno?

      Ppl should make their own YouTube Amazon / Google companies or else we shall all perish do to advertisements

      • Ignisnex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Servarr Suite. Netflix interface, piracy backend. Operates over Usenet. Can handle movies, tv, music and ebooks. I’ve been told there are viable workarounds for televised sports, specifically F1.

  • profdc9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    10 months ago

    If there are commercials, why should someone need an Amazon Prime membership at all? It becomes just like broadcast TV then, and they should just allow anyone to watch to maximize revenue. They have all this AWS infrastructure to deliver video, why not maximize the use of it?

      • profdc9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        But wouldn’t they make more money by not requiring a subscription and having many more viewers? They will get paid for showing ads, not collecting Prime subscriptions.

        • elrik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          If you don’t have prime you might not buy things from Amazon which would probably be a net loss compared to the potential ad revenue increase.

    • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      You can use Amazon to buy things without subscribing. $35+ order gets free shipping

      • braxy29@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        this is one reason why i have never had prime. not that i order much from amazon anyway (very rarely, in fact).

        i think people think amazon is a lot more indispensable than it actually is.

    • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      You can also torrent all movies. That way if you want to watch it again later on you don’t need to download the whole thing again like you would with streaming. Streaming is really just downloading without saving.

      • chitak166@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Absolutely. The problem with torrenting is that it is less-accessible to laymen.

        They need a VPN to torrent safely, which immediately cuts out most of them. They also need storage, which many of them do not know how to manage.

          • chitak166@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Downloading entire seasons of shows? Yes you do, especially if you want to watch whatever you want whenever you want like with free streaming sites. I also mentioned managing storage, not just having it. Many users of paid streaming services have never interacted with a file manager.

            You need to keep the layman’s perspective in mind if you want to appeal to them.

    • jdeath@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Me too! I’d been meaning to, but finally did it yesterday right after they sent the email letting me know hahaha