AplasticAenima@lemmy.world to AI Generated Images@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 months agoLive, laugh, lovelemmy.worldimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up142arrow-down111file-text
arrow-up131arrow-down1imageLive, laugh, lovelemmy.worldAplasticAenima@lemmy.world to AI Generated Images@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square12fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarefunkless_eck@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·2 months agobut still terrible at bodily proportions
minus-squareharl3k1n@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 months agoProportions seem fine in this picture, if “taken with wide angle lens” was part of the prompt.
minus-squarefunkless_eck@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-22 months agoher torso and pelvis are on slightly different scales especially when considering her hair and shoulders and the (assumed) male hand has a very large forearm- not impossible but it all adds up to a slightly less than stellar output
minus-squareharl3k1n@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoI wouldn’t have noticed, but I don’t have a trained eye for such things.
minus-squarehoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoLooking at it with your description, the only thing that looks a bit off to me is the hand thing. The rest I can’t even identify cause it’s so minor.
but still terrible at bodily proportions
Proportions seem fine in this picture, if “taken with wide angle lens” was part of the prompt.
her torso and pelvis are on slightly different scales especially when considering her hair and shoulders and the (assumed) male hand has a very large forearm- not impossible but it all adds up to a slightly less than stellar output
I wouldn’t have noticed, but I don’t have a trained eye for such things.
Looking at it with your description, the only thing that looks a bit off to me is the hand thing. The rest I can’t even identify cause it’s so minor.