Alternative Title: “Bluesky pretty sure these leopards won’t eat their face.”

  • Sl00k@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Aren’t identities already decentralized by using domains you own as your identity? Ex. Incase you’re unfamiliar, my Bluesky @ is my domain I own.

    • Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I believe that’s your handle, not your identity. Your handle resolves to your identity, but your identity isn’t directly tied to it, in case you lose the domain.

      • Sl00k@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        While they definitely do this for handles I’m pretty confident this is also done for DIDs (Decentralized identifiers) and it doesn’t provide a solution if you lose your domain. I think Bluesky (Appview) specifically gets around this by also tying your DID:web to your DID:plc, in case of domain loss. So I think it exists on the protocol but they don’t automatically utilize the decentralization for end-user experience(domain loss) but other appviews can. But I could be wrong.

        https://atproto.com/specs/did

        • Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, did:web exists, but I still called it centralized because it still relies on did:plc pretty much everywhere (though honestly domain name handles might actually be did:web, not sure). Didn’t know about that dual setup by Bluesky though!