Alphane Moon@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoSam Altman said startups with only $10 million were 'totally hopeless' competing with OpenAI, DeepSeek's disruption says otherwisewww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square76fedilinkarrow-up1577arrow-down118
arrow-up1559arrow-down1external-linkSam Altman said startups with only $10 million were 'totally hopeless' competing with OpenAI, DeepSeek's disruption says otherwisewww.tomshardware.comAlphane Moon@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square76fedilink
minus-squareAlphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·3 months agoI get it. I just didn’t know that they are already using “beyond AGI” in their grifting copytext.
minus-square👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·3 months agoYeah, that started a week or two ago. Altman dropped the AGI promise too soon now he’s having to become a sci-fi author to keep the con cooking.
minus-squareZeroCool@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·3 months ago now he’s having to become a sci-fi author to keep the con cooking. Dude thinks he’s Asimov but anyone paying attention can see he’s just an L Ron Hubbard.
minus-squareschizo@forum.uncomfortable.businesslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 months agoHell, I’d help pay for the boat if he’d just fuck off to go spend the rest of his life floating around the ocean.
minus-squareDamage@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·3 months agoYou say that like Hubbard wasn’t brilliant, morals notwithstanding
minus-squarefutatorius@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·3 months agoHe sure as shit wasn’t a brilliant writer. He was more endowed with the cunning of a proto-Trump huckster-weasel.
minus-squarecygnus@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·3 months agoWell, it does make sense in that the time during which we have AGI would be pretty short because AGI would soon go beyond human-level intelligence. With that said, LLMs are certainly not going to get there, assuming AGI is even possible at all.
minus-squarephdepressed@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·3 months agoWe’re never getting AGI from any current or planned LLM and ML frameworks. These LLMs and ML programs are above human intelligence but only within a limited framework.
minus-squareMsPenguinette@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superintelligence#Feasibility_of_artificial_superintelligence Artificial Superintelligence is a term that is getting banded about nowadays
minus-squareNightwatch Admin@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months agoAh ok, yeah the “beyond” thing us likely pulled straight out of the book I mentioned in my edit.
I get it. I just didn’t know that they are already using “beyond AGI” in their grifting copytext.
Yeah, that started a week or two ago. Altman dropped the AGI promise too soon now he’s having to become a sci-fi author to keep the con cooking.
Dude thinks he’s Asimov but anyone paying attention can see he’s just an L Ron Hubbard.
Hell, I’d help pay for the boat if he’d just fuck off to go spend the rest of his life floating around the ocean.
You say that like Hubbard wasn’t brilliant, morals notwithstanding
He sure as shit wasn’t a brilliant writer. He was more endowed with the cunning of a proto-Trump huckster-weasel.
Well, it does make sense in that the time during which we have AGI would be pretty short because AGI would soon go beyond human-level intelligence. With that said, LLMs are certainly not going to get there, assuming AGI is even possible at all.
We’re never getting AGI from any current or planned LLM and ML frameworks.
These LLMs and ML programs are above human intelligence but only within a limited framework.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superintelligence#Feasibility_of_artificial_superintelligence
Artificial Superintelligence is a term that is getting banded about nowadays
Ah ok, yeah the “beyond” thing us likely pulled straight out of the book I mentioned in my edit.