joel1974@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours agoWhy I am not impressed by A.I.lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square91fedilinkarrow-up1223arrow-down149
arrow-up1174arrow-down1external-linkWhy I am not impressed by A.I.lemmy.worldjoel1974@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours agomessage-square91fedilink
minus-squareGrandwolf319@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·8 hours ago If you think of LLMs as something with actual intelligence you’re going to be very unimpressed Artificial sugar is still sugar. Artificial intelligence implies there is intelligence in some shape or form.
minus-squarecorsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 hours ago Artificial sugar is still sugar. Because it contains sucrose, fructose or glucose? Because it metabolises the same and matches the glycemic index of sugar? Because those are all wrong. What’s your criteria?
minus-squareGrandwolf319@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoIn this example a sugar is something that is sweet. Another example is artificial flavours still being a flavour. Or like artificial light being in fact light.
minus-squareJohnEdwa@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-27 hours agoSomething that pretends or looks like intelligence, but actually isn’t at all is a perfectly valid interpretation of the word artificial - fake intelligence.
Artificial sugar is still sugar.
Artificial intelligence implies there is intelligence in some shape or form.
Because it contains sucrose, fructose or glucose? Because it metabolises the same and matches the glycemic index of sugar?
Because those are all wrong. What’s your criteria?
In this example a sugar is something that is sweet.
Another example is artificial flavours still being a flavour.
Or like artificial light being in fact light.
Something that pretends or looks like intelligence, but actually isn’t at all is a perfectly valid interpretation of the word artificial - fake intelligence.