Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Scientists move to Bluesky, transitioning away from X and Meta platformswww.dailyuw.comexternal-linkmessage-square244linkfedilinkarrow-up11.68Karrow-down127
arrow-up11.65Karrow-down1external-linkScientists move to Bluesky, transitioning away from X and Meta platformswww.dailyuw.comSunshine (she/her)@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square244linkfedilink
minus-squaresudoer777@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·1 年前Probably because it has an algorithm
minus-squarebrucethemoose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·1 年前This. Many people like stuff getting recommending to them algorithmically.
minus-squaremerdaverse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 年前Exactly. I’ve curated my Mastodon feed way more than Bsky, and still, it’s incredibly boring. Great if you want to use socials less. It also tends to overvalue new stuff, so whoever screams the most occupies the most space in the feed.
minus-squarenotsoshaihulud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 年前tech and age, need for investment. fediverse is complicated for scientists not doing computer sciency stuff senior researchers are less flexible with new tech, so similarity w twitter means they don’t have to learn a new system Already present audience means there’s little risk in investing time in BS.
minus-squaremostlikelyaperson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前It doesn’t though.
Probably because it has an algorithm
This.
Many people like stuff getting recommending to them algorithmically.
Exactly. I’ve curated my Mastodon feed way more than Bsky, and still, it’s incredibly boring. Great if you want to use socials less.
It also tends to overvalue new stuff, so whoever screams the most occupies the most space in the feed.
tech and age, need for investment.
It doesn’t though.