simple@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoUS appeals court rejects copyrights for AI-generated art lacking 'human' creatorwww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square6linkfedilinkarrow-up1221arrow-down12
arrow-up1219arrow-down1external-linkUS appeals court rejects copyrights for AI-generated art lacking 'human' creatorwww.reuters.comsimple@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square6linkfedilink
minus-squarexthexder@l.sw0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agoYou can buy a license to use the work from the original author. Why would you give a machine money? Just use the generation tools yourself and then you have the copyright. If there was no human input then it’s just worthless AI slop.
You can buy a license to use the work from the original author.
Why would you give a machine money? Just use the generation tools yourself and then you have the copyright. If there was no human input then it’s just worthless AI slop.