• Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have never felt the need to have a wired connection for my DNS/DHCP, since such a trivial amount of data exchanges hands. The quality of the wired connection if it had one would similarly have negligible impact, surely.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      For me it’s not about the bandwidth, it’s about the lag and reliability. I have had strong WiFi connections flake out a lot more than wired connections.

      Also, I just prefer to not have 100+ WiFi devices kicking around my network when more than half of them could be wired, or on another protocol like Zigbee.

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I guess I am pretty far from saturating my WiFi in any way, the removal of cables with little to no impact on connectivity was far more of a priority for me. I have never noticed a WiFi related outage or performance loss.

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I will say this: we had a big lightning strike a few years back and it conducted into the house via the internet cable, then spread via the ethernet cables taking out everything that was wired (over $7K in damage) - devices connected only by power and WiFi were mostly spared.

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          My WiFi routers have historically struggled a bit, I’ve got a decent one now, but even it is slow to manage the DHCP lists for fixed assignments by MAC address.