• The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      1 month ago

      We used to just call that “pointing out hypocrisy” before Americans found a thought terminating phrase for it

      • DeusUmbra@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        No, pointing out hypocrisy would be going “hey, didn’t you also blatantly rip off a popular product? Isn’t it hypocritical for you to criticize them for something you also have done?” What Aboutism is defined as: “the rhetorical practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counteraccusation, by asking a different but related question, or by raising a different issue altogether. Whataboutism often serves to reduce the perceived plausibility or seriousness of the original accusation or question by suggesting that the person advancing it is hypocritical or that the responder’s misbehavior is not unique or unprecedented.” https://www.britannica.com/topic/whataboutism

        • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 month ago

          And, as always, it is in the sealion’s power to determine what is the same, and what is “different but related”.

          Arf arf arf

            • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              It’s not redirecting the conversation to respond to your statement that whataboutism is when the hypocrisy is “unrelated”. Which conveniently lets you decide what is related or unrelated.

              Do you not consider Russians human?