IndescribablySad@threads.net@sh.itjust.works to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 2 years agoAnon goes apesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square38linkfedilinkarrow-up1391arrow-down128
arrow-up1363arrow-down1imageAnon goes apesh.itjust.worksIndescribablySad@threads.net@sh.itjust.works to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 2 years agomessage-square38linkfedilink
minus-squareJokklMaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up44arrow-down4·edit-22 years agoNo because this is classical operant conditioning not Pavlovian. Edit: Corrected for my stupid response while exhausted.
minus-squareRodeo@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up26·2 years agoPavlovian conditioning IS classical conditioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning
minus-squareDaefsdeda@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up15·2 years agoI think its like every pavlovian is a classical but not every classical is a pavlovian.
minus-squareJokklMaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoThis is what happens when I’m posting while exhausted. It’s not Pavlovian/classical, it’s operant conditioning.
No because this is
classicaloperant conditioning not Pavlovian.Edit: Corrected for my stupid response while exhausted.
Pavlovian conditioning IS classical conditioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning
I think its like every pavlovian is a classical but not every classical is a pavlovian.
This is what happens when I’m posting while exhausted. It’s not Pavlovian/classical, it’s operant conditioning.