Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-217 hours agoAmy Klobuchar learned that a video clip of her was going viral on social media. So she clicked on it. She saw her face and her voice saying vulgar things she had never said. It was an AI deepfake. www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square19linkfedilinkarrow-up1132arrow-down16
arrow-up1126arrow-down1external-linkAmy Klobuchar learned that a video clip of her was going viral on social media. So she clicked on it. She saw her face and her voice saying vulgar things she had never said. It was an AI deepfake. www.nytimes.comDavriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-217 hours agomessage-square19linkfedilink
minus-squareCmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·15 hours agoWell they already have a leg up with the TAKE IT DOWN Act that Democrats worked with Ted Cruz and Trump to get passed.
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·14 hours agoTo my knowledge, that only covers pornographic content.
minus-squareCmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·13 hours agoAnd the Patriot Act was only implemented to catch terrorists. What’s considered “pornographic content” is entirely subjective and up to the personal feelings of a particular judge.
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 hours agoThere’s no judge in the world who could make the leap that this is pornographic.
minus-squareAwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 hours agoLooks at judges who have decided any sign of support for Palestine is terrorism
minus-square✨🌱💚🟢🟩⭐️🔮⭐️🟩🟢💚🌿✨@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 hours agoas a victorian from over a century ago, i find anything depicting unclothed ankles to be porn.
Well they already have a leg up with the TAKE IT DOWN Act that Democrats worked with Ted Cruz and Trump to get passed.
To my knowledge, that only covers pornographic content.
And the Patriot Act was only implemented to catch terrorists. What’s considered “pornographic content” is entirely subjective and up to the personal feelings of a particular judge.
There’s no judge in the world who could make the leap that this is pornographic.
Looks at judges who have decided any sign of support for Palestine is terrorism
as a victorian from over a century ago, i find anything depicting unclothed ankles to be porn.
…for now…