• Glitchvid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 个月前

    Great article, appreciate that I’m not the only one concerned around some of the ethical choices Kagi has been making.

      • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 个月前

        Last I saw they still paid Yandex for access to that index (weigh how important that is yourself), they also pushed back on suicide warnings if you ask Kagi how to kill yourself, and I learned from this article that they may be using additional data sources that contain higher levels of homophobic sentiment.

        Basically, the company’s tagline is “Humanize the Web”, but I don’t think their actions thus far show we agree on what Humanize means.

    • isaacd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 个月前

      Same. I use Kagi because search is an essential function of my job and I can’t extract decent results from Google anymore, but if there were another engine with equally good results and a better ethical track record I’d switch.

      (There isn’t. I’ve tried Qwant, Ecosia, DuckDuckGo and a handful of others. Was not impressed.)

      • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 个月前

        I share the sentiment. For me the results are acceptable, and being able to custom rank sites in results is very useful, but the killer feature is not having ads or forcing AI down my throat.