• Goodeye8@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    And Silksong will also run like shit if I run an AI model in the background that’s hogging all resources, but if I said Silksong ran like shit on a 4090 you’d say I’m full of shit. But with Borderlands 4 it would be okay to say that because it fits your biases?

    My point is you can’t take such statements at face value. They need to be looked at critically because who knows what the person is doing with their machine or what kind of information they’re omitting. Maybe the other person has a CPU bottleneck because they threw a 4090 together with a Ryzen 7 2700X? If you take them at face value you’re just reflecting your own biases which means you call it bullshit if it doesn’t fit your bias or you agree with it when it does fit your bias.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      But my guy, you provided context which shows that Borderlands 4 does run like shit on a 4090 in a lab environment.

      Borderlands 3 on highest settings with a 4090, a worse cpu, at 1440p ran at 210 average fps.

      You telling me that Borderlands 4 looks good enough compared to 3 to explain a 143 fps drop?