• slimerancher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It did feel like exaggeration to me, but it could be my bias. May feel differently about it later.

    You are right about the fact that it could be an agency. Maybe I was just being pedantic 😀

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Eh, when someone says “private investigator,” I subconsciously assume there could be a group involved, and not one person. If I hire a tax preparer, there are probably multiple people involved (the person preparing the tax docs, the accountants auditing those docs, people auditing their software, etc).

      If someone says “private investigators,” I assume they contacted multiple agencies, perhaps on multiple occasions.

    • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean, we’re all being pedantic, aren’t we? honestly, I don’t even know why we wasted the time we have on this lmao. for me it’s probably because I’m working and bored to death.