• edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The blue vs green bubble thing never really bothered me. As long as I can communicate with the person I’m talking to, I don’t care how the messages are sent, unless maybe if I don’t want a message to be sent over plain sms. It’s ridiculous how it has become a status thing.

    • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It is though. I’m the only developer in an agency of designers. Yes, they all have iphones and I’m the only Android lol

      It’s absurd, but i get the blue bubble looks of superiority all the time.

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I predict one of two outcomes once Apple becomes aware of this. Either they’ll modify the iMessage protocol to break Nothing Phones compatibility, or they’ll sue Nothing Phone for violating some kind of IP law. Apple absolutely wants to maintain their walled garden and letting a non-Apple product transparently interact on equal footing with Apple products runs counter to that.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The messaging is provided by a third party who is dedicated to working on their iMessage compatibility. Apple has no reason to stop this because this is a good move for them in the larger battle between mobile messaging standards.

      Google owns Jibe, the company behind RCS messaging found on all Android phones and an emerging, competent product from the only game in town that can compete with Apple. Google has decided to take this to the government level and push for a unified phone messaging standard, normally a good thing, but proposed their own RCS solution. The one they own and whose servers Google scrapes for user info.

      Apple is pushing iMessage as a protest against Google and their inevitable lawsuit to conform with RCS adoption. Android may win unless Apple shows it has parity and provides a non-legislative option: if enough people use iMessage then governments don’t have to make any laws or enforce changes. The company Nothing is using iMessage, which helps Apple prove there is both a significant user base, which would cause a burden on Apple and it’s customers to change, and there is no monopoly on iMessage or messaging in general. So if enough people use iMessage, Apple sees it as a good thing.

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        RCS is not a Google product, see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GSMA

        Apple has been pushing iMessage for quite some time, but they want to keep it just to their platform and have made no attempt to make it open to other users. That’s Apples way and it’s not as a “protest” to Google lol

        That’s like saying they made the lightning port as a protest to USB standards, nah they just want their proprietary shit.

        • kirklennon@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s like saying they made the lightning port as a protest to USB standards, nah they just want their proprietary shit.

          They wanted a new, compact, durable, reversible plug for their mobile devices. There was no industry-standard option that met their requirements, so they made their own. If USB-C had existed at the time, they would have used it (though as a physical connector, Lightning is still just plain better).

          • Poggervania@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Lmao, how is Lightning better than a USB-C? They’re both practically the same thing, even in durability. Apple might’ve made Lightning first, yes, but then USB-C came out like 2 years later.

            Be real here: Apple only stuck with Lightning because it’s stupid easy money for them. Cables are hella cheap to make, and if you make them in-house, you basically spend like $2 at most to manufacture 1 cable. Lightning has the upside of both that and forcing people into the Apple ecosystem because their old phone cables can charge the new phones.