• TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean it absolutely is illegal to retaliate against unionizing workers by firing them, that’s why they didn’t say “we fired them because they unionized”. And Canada isn’t America, we don’t have right to work legislation and you can’t generally just fire people en masse without cause out of the blue

    • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Except ubisoft is hemorrhaging money so it’s an extremely easy sell to say “the studio is not profitable and we’re in dire need to cut waste” and indeed can the lot.

        • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I mean, I’d bet dollars to donuts Ubisoft would win it handily if it gets to a class action or whatever equivalent.

          For one, they’re basically on the verge of falling over so the economic motivation is a no-brainer.

          For two, it’s a massive multinational company headquartered in France (a country with stronger labour laws than Canada) with plenty of legal advice available on these matters. I highly doubt they’d do it this blatantly if they were not confident this is an easy sell, instead of waiting something like 6 months to separate the 2 events enough for plausible deniability.

          For three, good luck holding a foreign company accountable, in general.