• caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s a multiplayer game.
    Not to legitimize the review bombers.
    And it is cooperative.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Ok, fair I guess. Does it have player vs player mode? That was what I was thinking off.

        • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          I see. Then in this case, its only fair to remove exploits. I always thought this game is offline single player only (never played the previous game, despite being in my library… oh boy the pile of shame). In this case I agree with you fully and there should be no reason for “review bomb”.

          • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            The first game was single-player only, and I was pleasantly surprised when the new one had multiplay. It’s why I got back into it: jump onto a voice call and hang out with my friends in a game we’re all playing.

          • Triasha@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            The multiplayer turned out great for me. It ended up being a big draw. My wife and best friend plays, and we have played together.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I would still call that single player. Comparing scores doesn’t make it multi-player.