Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoMicrosoft Teams users are extremely angry at new banner asking them to paywww.neowin.netexternal-linkmessage-square148linkfedilinkarrow-up1588arrow-down15
arrow-up1583arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft Teams users are extremely angry at new banner asking them to paywww.neowin.netLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square148linkfedilink
minus-squareCanIFishHere@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·2 days agoWhat was your Boss’ feedback? Why didn’t he/she like your recommendation? I’m going to guess a major constraint was too many sources for software.
minus-squareLordCrom@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoBasically, if they went with IBM and it broke, its IBM’s fault If they went open source and it broke, its our fault for picking it.
minus-squareGirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoI mean, they are probably running RedHat or Debian on their servers anyway, so if it’s reliable enough for them, then it’s reliable enough for clients.
minus-squareCanIFishHere@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoLiability for one’s product actually means something to IBM/Microsoft/etc. instead of some guy on github.
What was your Boss’ feedback? Why didn’t he/she like your recommendation? I’m going to guess a major constraint was too many sources for software.
Basically, if they went with IBM and it broke, its IBM’s fault
If they went open source and it broke, its our fault for picking it.
I mean, they are probably running RedHat or Debian on their servers anyway, so if it’s reliable enough for them, then it’s reliable enough for clients.
Liability for one’s product actually means something to IBM/Microsoft/etc. instead of some guy on github.