• db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    152
    ·
    8 days ago

    “What transpired is not reflective of who I am, the values I hold, or the way I was raised,” Henderson said.

    And yet. Your words fall pretty flat Mr Henderson when your actions are telling a very different story.

  • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    8 days ago

    “Now that the conference is over, the damage is done, and these people no longer pose a threat, I’d like to express how sorry I am and hope we can all move past this.”

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      They never lost their jobs. They were banned from the conference which is something hard to put a damage number on. They probably won’t sue the org because they remain part of it and are unlikely to want to take any real money from it that can otherwise continue going to helping diabetes research and advocacy. Maybe they can get a future conference paid for. They’re all relatively established in their careers.

      • davad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        8 days ago

        The easiest damages would be the cost of attending (conference tickets, travel, hotel). If there was reputational damage, that’s harder to prove but the conference could be liable for that. Seeing how many vocal supporters they have, reputational damage would be hard to prove

    • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      8 days ago

      Did they lose their positions? I haven’t read anything indicating that, just that they weren’t allowed back into the conference.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I lived in rural Idaho during the Obama years. The amount of times I had to listen to grown ass men fantasize about shooting or lynching the President was insane. Constant racist and derogatory statements.

      My grade school girls reported the boys on their bus would also talk about racist things all the time including killing Obama. The kid that won the Kiwanis award at school made a joke about not being black and the whole school assembly laughed.

      But as soon as their mango god king took power, just like Bush before him, it was suddenly disloyal to talk shit. Hell, you would lose your job for it and probably get a visit by the secret service.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    8 days ago

    The scientists were ejected for handing out copies of an April editorial—published in the ADA’s own journal Diabetes Care—that sharply criticizes the Trump administration for the damage and destruction it’s wreaking on biomedical research. The five scientists included Steven Kahn, professor of medicine at the University of Washington, who is the editor-in-chief of Diabetes Care and a co-author of the editorial. It also included former ADA President Desmond Schatz of the University of Florida.

    Whatta buncha maroons. Just for that I’m not gonna get the diabeetus.

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 days ago

    “What transpired is not reflective of who I am, the values I hold, or the way I was raised,” [ADA CEO] Henderson said. “I will work hard to bring our community back together to build on the progress we have collectively made for those affected by diabetes.”

    Jesus, he sounds like a pro athlete who got arrested for drunk driving.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 days ago

    So often this sort of thing makes sense because it’s conduct or disruption that are reasons they got kicked out. The topic could be <insert whatever>, but a clickbait title will latch onto that topic if it could be edgy…

    The scientists were ejected for handing out copies of an April editorial

    …yup. Well, obviously this isn’t one of those times.