Sure, I know a lot of projects have been on GH since before MS bought it, but they’ve owned it for quite a while now, so we really should be seeing better migration out by now, no?

Codeberg is nonprofit which seems more in the spirit of the Linux ecosystem overall. GH is for-profit…

  • BartyDeCanter@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The number one thing to remember about git is that you don’t need a full hosting service around it for basic functionality. If it’s just you, a single local repo will probably serve you just fine, maybe use a bare repo on your main machine or a Pi-level device if you like as a remote/backup. Just git init or git init --bare and you’re good to go. GitHub, Codeberg, Forgejo, and all the others exist to serve multi-contributor and/or public project-level needs.

    The number two thing to remember is that it is based around graph theory.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      58 minutes ago

      That’s some really helpful advice, thank you! 😃 I actually didn’t know you could just make any local folder a repo like that.

      Would a Forgejo instance still be helpful if I wanted to have “one point of truth” between multiple machines even if I’m the only dev? I already use Syncthing, but for some reason I feel like there’d be a lot of sync conflicts and stuff.

      The other main reason for wanting to learn Git, of course, is because it’s otherwise more difficult to try out changes to scripts and experiment, without finding yourself lost in the weeds and forgetting what worked last.

      My current “version control” is “copy the entire project folder before you do anything major.” 😂