I am ashamed that I hadn’t reasoned this through given all the rubbish digital services have pulled with “purchases” being lies.

  • Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Recording from free to air is legal because of the “time shifting” argument. The show is being broadcast regardless, just because it’s at an inconvenient time for you doesn’t mean you should have to miss it. It’s also worth noting that media producers fought tooth and nail against this.

    • GombeenSysadmin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Piracy is just reverse time shifting. It’s going to be on FTA TV at some point, I’m just making it more convenient to watch now.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Companies pay big bucks for timed exclusivity though. If reverse timeshifting was legal, movie theaters would go bankrupt. I feel like this wouldn’t hold up.

      • ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        The difference is that grabbing it pre-FTA is also grabbing a perfect copy. The quality may not matter to many of us, but to some it does. And because it matters to some, major copyright holders have started to treat unlicensed exchanges as “competition” from a business PoV (which is a concession from strictly seeing it as crime). So their business strategy is to compete with the unlicensed channels by offering perfect quality media at a price (they hope) people are willing to pay (also in part to avoid the inconvenience and dodgyness of the black market).

        FWiW, that’s their take and it’s why they get extra aggressive when the unlicensed version is perfect.