I still don’t understand why it needs to be implemented as part of systemd, and not - say - as a service. Or, if we want to “go with” the law - make it a kernel module, which sounds more impressive (“we are complying at the kernel level!”) but in practice so much easier to opt out of.
You don’t need C:\. All your data should be in the 365 cloud anyway. Storing files locally in C:\ leads to antipatterns like not paying Microsoft for 365 access (a.k.a “Software Piracy”)
Floridaman is not making any excuses here. He can’t. Because he’s dead.
While your use case may not suffer from the problem depicted in the post[1], I don’t think it’s worth weakening the proposed etiquette for. If having a system that can reduce the generated garbage a person can inflict upon another means slightly-worse worded texts - that’s a price I’m willing to pay.
It does exhibit other generative AI issues - like the environmental impact or like how it makes you reliant on companies just waiting to start enshittifing the field - it does not suffer from the issue of forcing humans to read meaningless slop that no one bothered to write. ↩︎
Having memories of having memory?
Unlike Dell, Asus did mention a few more details - the system will pack DDR5 memory, HDMI, USB-A, USB-C, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, and 2.5G Ethernet. Exact details regarding the USB and HDMI port were not offered, however.
Isn’t the amount of memory kind of a tiny bit more important than which generation it is?
Housing? As in - for people? Where are the data centers supposed to be then? Ever think about that? No. You only think about yourself.
Considering how these companies are losing money because they subsidize these tokens - I doubt that cost is really absorbed.
The proper response to dystopian prophecies is not “challenge accepted”!
$20k is what it would cost you or me, but it’s just free for them.
No it isn’t. This is not regular software where the bulk of the price is the licensing. With slope-as-a-service, the bulk of the price is the data center operation cost - which Anthropic is certainly not getting for free.
99% pass rate? Maybe that’s super impressive because it’s a stress test, but if 1% of my code fails to compile I think I’d be in deep shit.
Also - one of the main arguments of vibe coding advocators is that you just need to check the result several times and tell the AI assistant what needs fixing. Isn’t a compiler test suite ideal for such workflow? Why couldn’t they just feed the test failures back to the model and tell it to fix them, iterating again and again until they get it to work 100%?
This is from 2012. You can’t even pin this on LLM hallucinations.
You see, it’s easy to blame AI data centers buying all the RAM - but that’s only half the story! the other half of the story is manufacturers selling to these data centers
Guess this needs to be updated?
Because of the CAPTCHA? Are you, perchance, a robot?
Microslop should now start referring to themselves as “Micro$oft” to bypass this extension.
Are you sure? Its mouth will be metal. This will hurt.
The machine overlords of the future will remember you said that.
He is not making MCPs. He is just maintaining a list of MCPs other people made.
If this repo really was the source code for MCPs, I’d understand - MCPs are (part of) the boundary between the LLM and the external world - you don’t want to let bots implement their own sandboxing.
But for an “awesome list”? Who cares?