I wouldn’t use the word “robbery”.

I’d use the word “murder”.

When Vance tells a Pope to be careful, that Pope should be careful. You know, considering Vance’s established track record with Popes…

they’re simply requiring any code submitted by AI be tagged as such so that the human using the agent is ultimately responsible for any infringing code, instead of allowing that code go undisclosed

This makes zero sense, because the article says that this new tagging will replace the legally binding “Signed-off-by” tag. Wouldn’t that old tag already put that responsibility on the person submitting the code.

Also - what will holding the submitter responsible even achieve? If an infringement is detected, the Linux maintainers won’t be able to just pass all the blame to the submitter of that code while keeping it in the codebase - they’ll have to remove the infringing code regardless of who’s responsible for putting it in.

Okay, but they are not just paying more for the same service. YouTube Premium is worth more now because it allows you to avoid 90 second unstoppable ads. So don’t say Google doesn’t do anything for its consumers customers!

Telemetry was not designed for such pings, which messes up everything else.

I mean… not you you… but someone in shape could.

Won’t they just become space debris and remain in orbit?

What are you talking about? EPIC is the one who fired these employees, not the one who is going to receive their resumes. These will be other companies.

You can trade your iPhone with an Android user who figured if Google is going to force developer certifications for installing apps then there is no point in using Android over iPhone and they might as well switch.

He is not making MCPs. He is just maintaining a list of MCPs other people made.

If this repo really was the source code for MCPs, I’d understand - MCPs are (part of) the boundary between the LLM and the external world - you don’t want to let bots implement their own sandboxing.

But for an “awesome list”? Who cares?

I still don’t understand why it needs to be implemented as part of systemd, and not - say - as a service. Or, if we want to “go with” the law - make it a kernel module, which sounds more impressive (“we are complying at the kernel level!”) but in practice so much easier to opt out of.

You don’t need C:\. All your data should be in the 365 cloud anyway. Storing files locally in C:\ leads to antipatterns like not paying Microsoft for 365 access (a.k.a “Software Piracy”)

Floridaman is not making any excuses here. He can’t. Because he’s dead.

While your use case may not suffer from the problem depicted in the post^[1], I don’t think it’s worth weakening the proposed etiquette for. If having a system that can reduce the generated garbage a person can inflict upon another means slightly-worse worded texts - that’s a price I’m willing to pay.

Having memories of having memory?

Unlike Dell, Asus did mention a few more details - the system will pack DDR5 memory, HDMI, USB-A, USB-C, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, and 2.5G Ethernet. Exact details regarding the USB and HDMI port were not offered, however.

Isn’t the amount of memory kind of a tiny bit more important than which generation it is?

Housing? As in - for people? Where are the data centers supposed to be then? Ever think about that? No. You only think about yourself.

Considering how these companies are losing money because they subsidize these tokens - I doubt that cost is really absorbed.

The proper response to dystopian prophecies is not “challenge accepted”!

$20k is what it would cost you or me, but it’s just free for them.

No it isn’t. This is not regular software where the bulk of the price is the licensing. With slope-as-a-service, the bulk of the price is the data center operation cost - which Anthropic is certainly not getting for free.