It’ll become a partisan thing and then the Republicans will start killing more games just to make libs sad.
It’ll become a partisan thing and then the Republicans will start killing more games just to make libs sad.
And that’s fair. If we can’t figure out how to write this regulation properly, people shouldn’t sign it.
I don’t think so. It’s dead.
He hates StopKillingGames, because he thinks it will make bad actors try to ruin devs because he expects people to try to profit from being able to provide game access to players when the devs are out of the picture. So therefore we can’t stop killing games, we need to just let games die and stop feeling entitled to the necessary code to run servers. And besides we need to get comfortable buying games with temporary licensing deals that are more convenient and cheap for the developers so they can not renew them if the game isn’t successful, and if the license runs out then we need to accept that the music or car or whatever legally needs to be removed. And we need to accept that if corporate wants to delete our accounts or sew our mouth to somebody’s ass then that’s just gonna have to happen because it’s what we agreed to. Turns out the man is a business bro shill cunt totally cool with the new bullshit because it’s preferred by the suits.
What are the names of the people on the board, and the main shareholders?
Dick move tbh
Yeah that guy’s kids will be messed up.
Yeah, trying to discourage white guys from dating non white girls.
“You might like her now anon, but have you considered that you might have to be racist against your own kid?”
Q: “So how did you two meet eachother?”
Anon: “I wanted to fuck a jap and do a epic bleaching by making her have a blonde blue eyed kid, but it didn’t work so now i just have an Asian kid which in my mind basically means I have no kid”
As someone with over a hundred banned reddit accounts, you generally don’t get banned for disagreeing. So maybe not slurs, but maybe just general rude language. Or my personal favorite, bothering the mods.
Unless he’s Richard Dawkins, people do get banned if they argue about biological sex.
It might not have been particularly malicious, but your interpretation is a bit of a stretch. Besides, this never happened.
Something similar might have happened a few times, but never to original OP.
How do people like you survive?
No, sex gross, make it all illegal please. We have the technology, only synthetic crotch goblins from now on.
We need a literal horny jail, and enforcers with clubs.
Are you saying you want more active enforcement?
And then actually get the Darth Plagueis the Wise copypasta in there somewhere.
In exaggerating a little, but to me it’s pretty fucking clear you have some issues of your own. Not exclusively, but definitely as common tendencies.
I don’t know how deep the rabbit hole goes, but the less distinct pathologies of the common clay are certainly also much less explored. The plains lying between the tallest peaks and deepest, darkest caves, left comparably undisturbed. The resting place of the explorers, disinterested in undermining their own camp.
There are variations of normal, some whose defined traits might be even less charitable that those described in the definition of the prototypical autist.
Funny, but that’s entirely different from what I wrote in all but general vibe, maybe. Besides, following Israel’s example isn’t exactly a recipe for success.
I bid that non autistic people be named and categorized in a way that highlights their subtly hostile, backstabbing, cruel nature. You know, the common household “psychopath” who doesn’t actually meet the requirements for real psychopathy, but is still pathologically a dickish cynic playing a social game for minor wins in wealth and status, instead of simply being a friendly and polite contributor to society.
They named us.
Maybe we should name them.
Describe the traits that define them. Go into detail about what exactly is so wrong with them. Why they kill rally for warmongers. Why they sabotage eachother. Why they face obvious long term problems with such oblivious nonchalance.
The funny thing to me is that a throwaway Sony account seems more likely to make a future intentional use of Sony’s services a hassle.
You can’t make the account because that email is already in use. You do the “forgot my password” thing. You notice that the account’s name is terrible, and now you’ve spent more time fixing a worse thing than if you just didn’t have an existing account at all.
Or you make a new account with a new email. Making the God of War account a useless little mole on your library.
I’d call it an appendix, but unlike forced account creation for single player games, the appendix has actually been proven to have a legitimate purpose despite its shortcomings.
621 is more or less the site they go to for seeing the illustrations of dog dicks that they’re so fond of.