You’re such a fucking saint. I don’t have any idea how you have the patience you do.

Edit: this is meant as a compliment.

Looks at new skydiving license and rig

😆

Sometimes I think Lemmy needs reactions. Then I come to my senses.

You literally supported Rhodesia.

You don’t get to make moral arguments that anyone takes seriously and you sure don’t get to criticize others arguments. Yours led you to support Rhodesia.

Shit, I guess as I have to untag you as a defender of Rhodesia, and tag you with ‘Epstein Defender’

And now I remember why I have you tagged as a defender of Rhodesia.

People that want a civil discussion on the merits of a philosophy whose base principle is at best ethnic cleansing don’t deserve one.

You’re like a white northerner demanding a civil discussion on the merits of slavery to a black person in the underground railroad.

Your position is just as disgusting and ludicrous.

Spoken like someone that condemned the ANC as terrorists in the 80’s.

“Sure, apartheid is wrong, but the people suffering it and fighting it are the worst” <— you.

Don’t use namecheap.

Super happy with PorkBun

I love how ‘people I disagree with’ becomes ‘people without principles’

While a lot of libertarians end up being conservatives that want to be cool, I’ve met quite a few who believe strongly in the fundamental principles.

I disagree with them precisely because they are principled. I don’t feel the need to deny them their capabilities of believing something.

Is this just you being unable to imagine people who legitimately disagree with you?

Anarchists are to liberalism as libertarians are to Republicans.

Every so often you’ll run into one that is serious and intellectually rigorous to the ideals they profess, but most of them are simply (liberals/republicans) but also want to be cool.

And yet a single availability zone in AWS going down caused an outage?

Yes, a website without SSL is very likely a phishing attack, it means someone might be impersonating the real website and so it shouldn’t be trusted. Even if by a fluke of chance you hit the right site, all of your communication with it is unencrypted, so anyone in the path can see it clearly.

No, Google has hit me with this multiple times for sub domains where the subdomain is the name of the product and has a login page.

So, for example, if I have emby running at emby.domain.com they’ll mark it as a phishing site. You have to add your domain to their web console and dispute the finding which is probably automated. I’ve had to do this at least three times now.

All my certs were valid.

Goddammit.

Not just their scientists.

Look up operation bloodstone.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Bloodstone

I don’t think it does.

This is the correct answer and should be the top post.

Spoken like someone that doesn’t understand language or communication.

There is literally a name for this type of response, and yet you’re out here accusing people who are apparently more knowledgeable than you of insanity.

This comment is just ‘what do you have to worry about it you’re not doing anything wrong’ with extra words.

Hauk