That sounds like a level of detail it is not necessarily useful to go into with most people. I never experienced anyone non-technical complaining about cloud products, so it would just be proselytising about what to me is a hobby/passion project.
(Not that I’m big into self hosting, but to the extent I am)
Put the kids back in the factories I say
Aren’t waymos safer than human drivers? Why are we shitting on something that will reduce a huge source of death and injury?
Even the people working in sweatshops have better access to clothing than peasants pre-industrialisation.
You know proper socialist countries industrialised as fast as they could because their leaders saw the benefits it would bring?
Article talks about energy but not why they’re using weapons grade plutonium for that purpose. Anyone got an informed reason?
Why should a company be legally responsible for copyright infringement of its employees, if it wasn’t something they did for work?
They didn’t claim it was respectable, they claimed it made them not liable? Where’d you get this idea?
Then you should be less credulous. What is told to prospective employees is effectively public information.
Shows the importance of having a human in the loop.
And since the police vetted the image properly they shouldn’t be afraid of publishing it, right?
Göring would like a word. Closely followed by Arthur Harris, fighting for the title.
Funny. And got you to post this!
In fairness I also didn’t feel like I was reading eyewitness accounts of this kind of thing so maybe it doesn’t actually happen (or almost never, or did in the past but no longer)
Presumably not in California or wherever else there are sensible data protection laws?
I have heard that in America the police sometimes fine people for driving at the speed limit because they’re driving too slowly. It’s an absolute farce.
A law that everyone breaks is a law that the police can choose to prosecute anyone for, for any reason. A law that you can be prosecuted for not breaking means you can’t even escape being targeted.
I don’t believe it’s easier than rsync.
Was there a known issue there?
Are you really going to get defensively patronising over this? I think I’mma bounce, lol.
Yeah you might be right.
I should clarify I use GIMP. A lot! But this is one way it sucks. By this point I don’t know what other similar programs even have over it - it finally got adjustment layers after some decades. So if I can recognise this shortcoming anyone should be able to ;)
The other major thing was switching to single window mode. Floating windows for everything was absolutely batshit.
The first two sets of instructions are for drawing a disc, rather than a circle (a disc being a filled-in circle) and don’t extend to drawing a circle easily. The last method does, but it is about 10x as long. The traditional method for drawing a circle was to select the inner circle, save the selection to a channel, grow the selection by the pixel width of the stroke you want, subtract the saved selection, then fill. Wonderful /s
GIMP does not (unless I missed it in a ~recent update) have a shape tool like most image editors. The GIMP documentation in any case suggests using Inkscape for the purpose.
Just the word syntax? Sure. You teach coding at first by example, not from first principles. At some point, explaining the concepts helps in the teaching but not at first.