“Harvard scientist Rachel Greene”

Everyone’s happy

oh yeah, just giving in to opression is easier than fighting it, ain’t it?

fair enough, when I think about it theyre probably not better than the contacts in that sense

I am squarely on the reddit should lose this side.

Anthropic may be breaking copyright, but not Reddit’s copyright. Sure maybe Anthropic should be sued, but not by Reddit.

i have prescription swimming goggles

Shit in My Hands?

[citation needed]

wikipedia.org/wiki/Moisture_expansion

The battle of the ages

wikipedia.org/wiki/mould

For search I’m really happy with Kagi

I am optimistic about self driving, just not Teslas. Unlike other self driving cars, Tesla is exlusively reliant on cameras. Others, like Waymo, have cameras, lidarr sensors and radar.

Ironic, this comic (rightfully) disses bloom, which the original Oblivion used liberally.

The director said the lighting was coming from the same place as the music.

hahah that’s great

it’s clearly not the same time of day.

You don’t need to be a journalist to copy/paste a title verbatim

The majority of the rest of the world has 220-230v per phase, with three phases. using all three phases gives you access to ~400v

Yup. I don’t think training should be considered breaking copyright. Regurgitating though should.

There are examples of use cases besides the right now obvious one of LLMs “creating” “original” content.

One that comes to my mind is indexing books. Allowing for people to search for books based on a description.

On the other hand, it is not the learning in your example that is illegal, but the recital.

If you learn ten books by heart and make money writing shitty fanfics, thats not necessarily illegal.

and the music