It isn’t a spoiler though, it are basic game mechanics for Nier.
It is crucial to know you should keep playing after the credits. Because this isn’t normal for games. Otherwise people would get to the credits and think that’s the end.
I specifically also didn’t include any information other than the game changes when replaying.
What HarkMahlberg means is that the game isn’t finished when you reach the credits.
When you replay the game a second time, you get the story from a complete different perspective. And when you start again after beating the game again, you get again a totally different experience from a different perspective.
I love the chip system in this.
You can basically automate certain actions to make the game easier the way you like. Don’t enjoy shooting? Automate it. Don’t like doding? You are now a master. Slashing? Any enemy that gets close gets auto slashed.
I had the automated shooting enabled all the time, because I didn’t want to hold the button down the entire time.
The only thing you are missing out is more chip space for cooler upgrades.
Your body gets used to it.
Showering every day is also bad for your skin.
On eBay, right?
Offline games will stay existing, even if the AAA studios won’t create those.
But fuck em.
This feels a lot like a ragebait article.
What did Altman actually tweet that caused the backlash? I can’t seem to find it while skimming, only the responses to it.
-edit- Found it
It is a lot less rage inducing than the article makes it out to be.
If you cut out sugar completely, your brain/central nervous system/red blood cells would break down.
We definitely consume too much sugar, but caffeine is not needed for anything.
Far-right, aren’t white supremacists?
Lol, what dimension are you from?
Seems like you didn’t learn anything about it, did you?
It is only hidden because too many non-programmers become hysterical whenever AI is mentioned.
In a rational world, it wouldn’t need to be hidden.
It is more nuance than rationality.
There are plenty of reasons to hate on AI. But in the end they are just tools to automate things. It depends entirely on how it is being used. With enough effort and most importantly checking the output, you can create things faster while still keeping the same quality as before.
Calling anything that even slightly touched an LLM “slop” and crawling in a fetus position while crying is a lot less rational. These people have no idea about the real world.
If you can’t understand the technology behind it, please refrain from calling other people names. It makes you look ignorant.
The EU is very privacy focused, as should be apparent with the post you are literally commenting on.
Your russian propaganda holds no power here. It didn’t work with chat control, and it won’t work with age verification either.
Yeah, tankies can’t handle it.
That “trojan horse” is nothing but a paper tiger since age control will be managed in a completely privacy-friendly way. It is a non-issue. So that is why it is being “overlooked”
The check will send nothing more than a yes/no verification, and no other forms of identification.
And the information will be managed by a governmental institute that already has all that information.
No, those things can be done in a completely private way.
There is no such thing as permanent laws. And for good reasons.
I wonder what all these anti-EU russian propaganda bots are going to use now to sow discontent against the EU… lol
Don’t forget to get the bosses health to 0!