Needs more CAD

They are better, but you foolishly assumed that they meant better for the consumer, not better for the seller.

They are unenforceable for more reasons than that. They also can not prove that you agreed to it, only that someone did.

Also, they can’t change the terms of your previous purchase after the fact. They can make you agree to something new going forward, but if they make your current device a brick because you don’t agree (which they are doing here), then they need to reimburse you for causing the loss of use of your device that you already purchased and was working under the previous terms.

It’s google, they’ll just stop working on it.

Or add 3% to the green grid

Three apps, plus still needing iTunes for podcasts. Thanks, Apple.

Bunch of jabronis

Why wouldn’t they? It wouldn’t be recognizable once they chopped it up, which probably would take them 10 minutes or so.

It’s easier said than done, but it’s not that difficult. It’s mostly reconfiguration of plumbing and zone controls on HVAC. The electrical is easier to distribute.

If you commit to doing it the right way, and tear it down to the structure (but leave the facade alone), it’s not terribly difficult.

The problem is that the building owners want to do it cheap, and it won’t be cheap. It will be more economical in the long run than fully vacant building though.

“old” & “late 90s” = Go straight to hell, young’un!

Yes, but actually no. They are looking NOW, because they are being forced to look. They apparently weren’t before, which is a sign of bad QA, and the scary part for the potential passengers.

I just want them to make it a KC Chiefs helmet full-time.

I keep multiple versions in the same library. I use Emby, and, as long as my naming is good, I get one listing for each movie, and the ability to select which version to watch.

You just reminded me of something I saw once, that I’d love to find. It was some sketch comedy show, and the sketch was “Every episode of Star Trek”. It was hysterical.

They can also be a sign of poor quality control and/or poor quality in general, which makes them newsworthy to people (potentially) entrusting their lives to the workmanship involved.

Possibly, but I’d think there’s an equal chance that it interests new customers. I’d have to see data proving either way.

But it’s still ridiculous to be so concerned about the corporation that made a kabillion dollars in profit last year. If they’re so go at their business that they can make those kinds of profits, one leaked image is not a problem.

Maybe.

Won’t someone think of the corporations?!

I think it’s actually the ADA that requires them, now that I think about it, but I know in commercial buildings there are requirements for size and location of mirrors in bathrooms (maybe only if you choose to install them).

How do they do that? IIRC, mirrors are required per building codes?

Enshittification doesn’t mean “thing gets shittier”? Who knew?!