I recognize this line but what’s the relation to this post? Is it something in the lyrics or something else?

Great show, but binging seasons gets rough

My thoughts exactly when i was watching old seasons of Canadas worst drivers

Nail, head

Reality tv shows took this the farthest its so bad

That’s a boring cover of a description.

If it exists, there is porn of it

But it does heal. Efficiently be damned. That’s not what you care about with mad science. Results are all that matter in mad science, good results or bad results you just have an insatiable desire to see what happens if

Just one specific point of contention. A physical object is very different from an object that can infinitely and effortlessly be copied with 0 degradation of that thing.

I think you are making a good argument and but maybe not the best example.

I think there is significance in the difference that needs to be accounted for in any discussion of piracy as theft.

It is currently, and has been for a long time, legal to copy music from the radio or movies and tv shows from a broadcast(but not pay per view, or copys for distrubution) or go to a library and borrow whatever interesting (to you) media they have.

I love you just a little bit!

Can anyone explain how lasers are used to cool? I would prefer ELI18 but i probably need this ELI5

Company called vinfast opened up next to tesla in my town. Never heard of them so i checked it out and they have a battery subscription option which was interesting to me, if its like propane tank exchange systems it could be interesting, since its the battery that seems to be the. Biggest concern for people having to replace down the line. Would make a lot of sense for heavy use situations(delivery, sales that travel a lot etc and burn through leases regularily)

Rainforests. Like the Amazon that is being deforested obscenely in some areas

We three!

Jesus fucking christ you are just trolling, and im walking right into it. What waste of time

No snark. I dont understand the point of adding that second line if its not accurate or indicative of the previous statement. If it isnt clarifying conditions of the previous statement, it just adding confusion. So how does it “reinforce”. Like literally how is that a statement that supports the previous one?

Edit. Im starting to think maybe i am on the spectrum…

How is that in anyway relevant to this discussion about them as a contraceptive device???!?

You might as well be talking about the pull put method of contraceptive with a line like that, which is not helpful

And any audiologist or ENT will back them up and also tell you not to do that and then give you examples of known reasons why they also say dont use them

Okay fair enough and thank you for responding. Im not arguing the pedantry of it, but i do believe its useful and not needless. Meaning i think its worth discussing and debating.

Because if im wrong, then theres no difference between;

Ideally the internet would be provided with the same indifference as water and electricity. With no stipulations on how or why you’re using it.

And

Ideally the internet would be provided with the same indifference as water and electricity.

So if im wrong as i understand thats what you mean, i would genuinely like to understand what/why ”with no stupulations on how or why you’re using it" it is worth including.

Again if im wrong i literally cant see the difference and will go a long way to help me not respond to these kinds of things in the future and you would have done a service by helping me not derail other conversations. Which i will be very grateful for your help

Especially if it’s true.

Which if they haven’t tested them, which is an easy thing to prove for them, then this should not be recommended by you, or anyone, as a contraceptive.

It’s like my ex trying to tell her birthcontrol is working just fine because she took 3 pills at once after forgetting to take it twice in a row even though the manufacturer says if you dont follow the directions you have to start the initial waiting period over again, because “i think they have to say that” (she also used those exact words)

Bad advice is bad advice. Why should anyone ever trust their future and also their health by listening to your advice that directly opposes the manufacturers warning. They are legally liable for their product, you are just some random person potentially ruining peoples lives with your opinions.

I hope they sue you for damages before anyone fucks up their life by being convinced by your bad attitude

Okay but there’s much less obvious examples. My point still stands

Also see my reply to gh0stcassette