

Would this act fall under moral boosting and memory retention exercises?
Meet me on the Internet.
Would this act fall under moral boosting and memory retention exercises?
I hope that this won’t mean there will be more advertising in protected areas because it satisfies new requirements.
Clean your links! https://youtu.be/pwODwwgE6rA
This is a wonderful resource (as far as I have read). I am happy to see various nuance incorporated into the reviews!
I am unconvinced that people / corporations can be neatly sorted into categories “good” or “bad”.
I argue that “good” behaviour is entirely dependent on who is the judge. There are numerous edge cases, for example, “don’t kill people”: one could argue that a company that promotes abstinence is reinforcing sexual shame, which could lead to suicide. Then another can argue that they are promoting degrowth (through abstinence), or even voluntary extinction.
Lastly I want to remind that breaking the notion that sorting people into categories like gender and sex is a similarly bad idea.
I sincerely doubt that there is a way to determine which behaviours/beliefs are good or bad. I, for example, doubt that I will get a rating of “good” beyond 75% (educated guess).
https://upvote.au/comment/949970 - I was referring to your instance. It is yours right? It does feel counterintuitive to use a closed source client to access an open-source network. If I may ask, how did you make the decision to use boost for lemmy?
It works now? I am going to read the lemmy.org guide and hopefully mend this. Thank you for replying, your instance has a comfortable ui.
Off topic: I see that there is “9 more replies” and I am unable to expand the thread… could someone please offer guidance?
What does a viable backup strategy look like in the modern day? How difficult is it to build and maintain it?