Is this image in the article AI generated or a meta replicant?

People in my neighborhood constantly cut speed cameras down every other week, do with this as you will.

Seems like it’s time to start looking at mesh internet networks.

Any news article with a AI generated image being front and center I personally ignore right away.

Yay! /s

Why does evey headline now need to have the word “quitely”, or any other buzzwords for that matter

What a inefficient use of land, let alone what’s being built on it.

Honestly I would probably prefer data centers built in old open pit mines before the mine gets filled back in.

Or maybe build them in Alaska for example where it’s cold, or space like a halo?

Fuck that, I want to own my shit and will build my own fucking server before renting space in a corporate owned server.

Alright Alright Alright

No one wants this at all.

They have been shoveling Gemini into all the smart speakers and Android Auto. Gemini can’t get anything correct.

I believe you are correct.

I was imagining “into the future” though, where everyone has a device that meshes with like devices, creating a internet of connect devices to transport data over large distances. All decentralized, if one node goes down traffic routes a different way in the mesh.

Think Cellphone Towers for examples, but the idea is everyone would have their own device at home (or on them) that instead creates the mesh and simultaneously access the mesh.

Same, decentralized mesh networks would be the equivalent of a “federated internet”. No one person owning the infrastructure.

If this were to become mainstream the mesh would become the “Internet”, with enough nodes, pcs and servers.

And in the meantime where one mesh does not “connect” to another, traffic could be routed through the “old internet” by one or more exit nodes connected to the “old internet”.

Thank you, your comment here helped me sort my issue out.

For anyone if you want to access this without the built-in proxy/caddy server set your ports in your docker compose like so.

• 3010:3000
• 3443:443 (this is the caddy port inside the container)

Understood, though it’s still kicking my butt TBH.

Exposing port 3010:3010 seems to get me a connection refused. But I can still connect to port 3443:443. Both ports are set to TCP.

Guess I’m just exhausted, will play around with it more tomorrow. Thanks for your help.

I am running in docker, I got 443 pointed at 3443.

I saw the 3010 setting in the docs, i just can’t figure out if 3010 is pointed at 80?

I am trying to put this behind Haproxy but not having much luck, I keep getting “client sent an HTTP request to an HTTPS server”.

Anyone have a clue how to resolve this?

I understand this image has its own caddy reverse proxy, not sure how to bypass that at the moment.

There goes my RAM

Don’t say AI slop, say AI trash instead

I would be interested in knowing what they two games are called if you happen to know.