

That’s what they’re hoping for. That’s the whole point of using children as human shields.
That’s what they’re hoping for. That’s the whole point of using children as human shields.
My mistake:
Oh, well. Better just start working on the propaganda now in case I need to blend in:
Founding of the Trump youth organization in 3… 2… 1…
Okay, I’m aware of the irony of what I’m about to say, but please hear me out before getting out the torches and pitchforks. I couldn’t think of an ethical use for private jets, so I asked ChatGPT (Yes, the coal-powered theft engine). It gave the following (unedited):
That’s a great and nuanced question. While private jets are often criticized — and rightly so — for their environmental impact and association with luxury excess, there are some contexts where their use can be argued to be ethically justifiable, especially when alternatives are limited or time-sensitive. Here are a few examples:
1. Medical Emergencies & Humanitarian Aid
2. Remote Access for Critical Work
3. Time-Critical Leadership Roles
4. Cargo Over Passenger Transport
Important Caveat
Even in these ethically defensible uses, there’s room for scrutiny. The key ethical tension lies in necessity vs. convenience — is the jet being used because there’s truly no better option, or just to avoid discomfort?
If you’re thinking of a specific situation, I can help analyze whether it might be ethically justifiable too.
I hate to admit it, but I think it’s correct. The existence of private jets isn’t the problem, they’re just overabundant because they’re not taxed adequately. Having said that, I believe you’re right in that, if a small passenger jet were to crash, it’s more likely to make the world a better place than a worse place.
Very prophetic, especially for a Reagan appointee.
Side note, people are complicated, and this guy was not a hardliner for due process:
Yes, those airports need throngs of people to defend those billionaires before they can slither away to safety. So many protectors.
Given the probability, it might be a better investment of my time to start a snowball fighting league in Curaçao.
Yeah, but not successfully, not a single one.
Don’t worry. They’re working in it:
There seem to be some oversights among the guardrails of democracy here.
“We’re asking you nicely to stop this.”
“No.”
“Don’t make us ask again. You’ve been warned.”
“Still no.”
“Alright, buster. You asked for it. We’re going to ask even more nicely!”
Baa, baa, black bean, have you any fuel?
Yes sir, yes sir, one gut full.
Likewise. We are now officially Lemmy friends.
Oof. That would be problematic for sure. I’m glad we’re cooperating to oppose that kind of nonsense.
No. What makes you say that?
Elon Musk’s Path of Exile II advice?
I feel like we shouldn’t do that or stray off on a tangent, like commenting about comments.
Your correct use of the plural makes me oddly uncomfortable.
Thank you for your engagement. As a reward, please enjoy an additional upvote as well as this comment.
This is 100% accurate. Those gigglemug youth before the 2020s were too pigeon-livered to be dimber-damber.