TheObviousSolution

Does a good parent place restrictions on what their child can and can’t do? Yes. The thing about bad parents is that they are notoriously irresponsible. They would be the least likely to utilize such a feature.

You are talking about going against a cartel of oligopolies that have locked down the technology sector with the IP they control and who have cutthroat control over where the latest technology is deployed. What we at home can do is playact “It’s back to the 90s!” and go back to the technology we had several decades ago, which is more viable than it sounds.

If they want to act like cartels with the greatest and latest, nothing is forcing people to use it. Unfortunately, the technological divide will still be there. Tech minimalism, go human, recycle old tech, we have a lot of crap we’ve disposed off over the years that would otherwise still run fine. To create competition, there needs to be the breeding grounds for it, and if that means having to do with what the lunar lander did, then do so and exercise that brain in the process too.

Devil’s advocate, is it really that bad for someone who is a parent to be able to easily zone of their Linux distro for their children? And yeah, I get there are a number of methods to do this like locking down accounts, but something like this would have the potential of automating whom the rules apply to.

While many of them continue to suck up to the pedophile-in-chief. The irony. It’s very telling that they place all the blame to the last link in the chain, they may very well be able to include entrapment in their defense.

All devs should be doing something like this. From what you are describing, you are basically dealing with cylon accounts waiting to get activated.

You know why.

BBS or nothing.

The Home Office’s failure to inform asylum applicants that AI tools are being used in their assessments is likely to be unlawful, according to a legal opinion, published today.

Not nearly as positive.

I wouldn’t be surprised if there is a Minecraft texture pack for that.

Nope, the only one spamming is you. You just don’t like me saying anything positive about it, even though there’s plenty I criticize.

That’s actually a good point. Nothing I’ve read seems to suggest this is getting rid of texture artists, but it could be a problem in the future. They claim it only alter lighting and materials, so for the moment I’ll take their word for it, but it does make you wonder just how much generative AI is involved.

I naturally assume there’s a distinct lack of humanity and a willingness to act like a psychopath with them.

If it was generating completely new images, I would agree. Worst I can do is criticize the things that are wrong with the filter.

This is an alt of TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca, yes. There’s another one, alts are not new.

supporting this in every thread that popped up

The support:

• NVIDIA is an abusive monopoly fueling international cartels partly responsible for the exaggerated PC prices.

• Requires high end GPUs, meaning giving said monopoly more power

• In actual gameplay, motion when the character talks creates this uncanny valley effect.

One of the many aliases spamming positivity.

… I just created this one. I think you just stated your real problem with my comments

positivity.

I’m not completely negative about the technology.

misinformation

This was actually right, before I created the account. Which is why I went through and corrected myself, and have made sure to rectify myself soon after. The purpose of this account is not to spread misinformation, it is to work on my mbin alts.

This comment is repeated because verdi has been spamming this libel.

You never go full ChatGPT.

I mean, if this is the way the average CEO is handling ChatGPT, a lot of things start to make sense.

It does not generate a new image, thus generates no AI slop in my book. It is an image filter with AI, which is what DLSS already was. Although Jensen does call it generative AI,

• It takes color and motion vectors and passes it as input through AI - same as previous versions of AI.

• It generates no new shapes or geometry.

• It just applies changes to lighting and materials, basically creating a mask over the original.

Valid criticism for me is:

• NVIDIA is an abusive monopoly fueling international cartels partly responsible for the exaggerated PC prices.

• Requires high end GPUs, meaning giving said monopoly more money.

• In actual gameplay, motion when the character talks creates this uncanny valley effect.

But …

I actually thinks it makes still images look better. /hides