

The meme came first. Then the coin. Then Elon. It used to be innocent.
The meme came first. Then the coin. Then Elon. It used to be innocent.
I’m not sure I’d like that. I kind of like there being a technological filter. It prevents the Fediverse from turning into Facebook or X. The public Internet has been around and part of society for 40 years now. If you still don’t get it in 2025, that ain’t everyone else’s fault. People using the Internet in the 90s had to deal with way more than just figuring out what an “instance” is.
Don’t worry, there’s enough other bronies out there to skew the average age up.
Yeah the article has a link to another one where “OMG it modified its own code to bypass restraints”, and then you read it and realize, no, it didn’t suddenly gain self awareness and try to “singularity” itself, it just recognized a problem and responded with a pattern it learned before to try to fix it, and spat it out at the researchers. That’s all.
The clickbait and misunderstanding from both anti and pro-AI folks is getting nauseating.
That will be a problem for sites that are all hosted on one IP address where the server figures out what site you want by the client’s request string.
deleted by creator
I can’t shop there often myself, I always walk out with even more Adafruit/RPi/Arduino shit I’ll never do anything with.
Is there a way to distribute it so everyone just has parts of it? Aren’t there p2p cloud storage solutions that exist?
I don’t think any of our classical open licenses from the 80s and 90s were ever created with AI in mind. They are inadequate. An update or new one is needed.
Stallman, spit out the toe cheese and get to work.
It’s art. It’s not real, and it’s not hurting anybody in real life. We shouldn’t ban things because they make you uncomfortable, we ban them when they harm actual people.
Edit: this is in no way an endorsement of that particular fetish. I personally think it’s sick and disgusting. But it’s not my place to tell someone else not to enjoy it if nobody was harmed in its production.
It can do that just fine, because it has seen enough examples of working code. It can’t directly count correctly, sure, but it can write “i++;”, incrementing a variable by one in a loop and returning the result. The computer running the generated program is going to be doing the counting.
I agree, but no, I’m not wearing the stupid mask.
When modern CPUs execute instructions, they try to make a best guess as to what the next instruction or data it needs will be while it’s still executing the first, to speed things up so it doesn’t have to wait until the entire instruction execution cycle is complete to start retrieving the next one from memory. These exploits force it to guess wrong, potentially pulling sensitive data out of memory and making it accessible to processes which usually can’t access it.
Carries entire homelab onto plane so who’s up for a LAN party? I’m hosting.
Id rather have at least something to throw into the gears of the system than nothing at all.
With a warrant. Main difference is the Chinese govt has no such roadblocks.
I remember the USAF handing me an M16 at 18 years old where all I’ve ever handled before that was even close was the NES zapper.
Why did we have to shoot the fucking Gorilla? Why?
Sometimes efficiency gains aren’t worth the cost and complexity. Regenerative braking produces a shitton more power than this, so it’s worth it (also, the motors are already there, just run them in reverse and turn them into generators). You can get the same thing by slapping a solar panel on the roof. Which nobody is doing because it’s too costly and complex for what you get out of it.