You crashed the wave function you fool!

Voldemort: 😢

But who will think of the shareholders!!!

As far as you know…

Technically the british parted from their own government first…

It’s just your boot sequence.

The angriest upvote of them all.

You can welcome an invasion as a liberation force if no patriotism is involved. Like the eastern front did in WW2 until they realized Nazis were more about creating Lebensraum.

It can be alright if you think your nation’s value are worth preserving. E.g. it is Patriotic to defend your country against a fascit invader that wants to remove your nation’s self-determination.

I think the author attempted first time login to be with the right password.

Create a niche community for that.

Department of motor vehicles.

Kraftfahrzeug-Zulassungsbehörde

It’s about winning, that’s mostly it. The US elections are more of a popularity contest for way too much of the electorate.

Cult of personality will make them accuse other actors for any of his failures.

Watch out! Lemmy is full of Fudd that are not part of the cult. You need actual data to convince them and not even just the comparison of 2 numbers but something that takes into account the comparative size of both industries.

Don’t worry, you will be able to laugh at them after your gambling addiction pays up.

(Jk you might not even be a line goes up guy but you do seem to have a lot of the crypto bible memorized)

Works better if she’s french.

You’re such a fake leftist.

Yeah i was referring to the dissolution of property rights when referring to anarchy. It was more colloquial than the actual system. Yes I didn’t copy the wiki for anarchy because it was irrelevant.

Not sure where you took the opinion as facts thing but okay…

Anarchy in 2 words, no state. It’s mostly a thing in history in opposition to something else.

Don’t be silly, I know why ghettos are created. My point was more towards the organization of urbanization through land ownership can help.

Now what do you propose we implement instead?

Every generation, people want to try new things and it’s nice. But landownership can and has been and good thing in a way that just going back to “anarchy” wouldn’t work. E.g. creation of ghettos, who gets to farm the best land, etc.

So then the suggestions are that the land are owned and “managed” by the state apparatus. Now we have a few famines in history to show us how gaining favor in a political system is not the best way to manage the land.

I’m open to better suggestions but just shitting on land ownership seems easy and unproductive.