![](https://lem.monster/pictrs/image/a7a0071d-1c14-4eeb-901f-9c26935bf517.png)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/045a2049-eb61-4960-88ba-97e7f1ffbf31.jpeg)
Nintendo doesn’t really restrict things in that way. It would be very strange for them to block a game from publishing on switch for those reasons.
All things are possible through Christ!
Nintendo doesn’t really restrict things in that way. It would be very strange for them to block a game from publishing on switch for those reasons.
You’ve lost me on this one. No idea what you mean. But either way, I think you should take my comment just a bit less seriously.
So in other words, I’m thinking of Linux
On bad operating systems like Linux, yes. ;)
Anyone else get free Ubuntu CDs shipped to their house? I think I had 7.10 (Gusty Gibbon) shipped to my house back in 2007.
Otherwise, Mandrake Linux was my first “good” distro. I first tried one called Lycoris which claimed to be an beginner’s distro with it’s own DE, and it was impressive how well it handled setting up a dual boot installation and at the time it was a revelation that I could use a computer without Windows. I didn’t begin preferring linux until I tried Mandrake with KDE 3, though.
It’s not as if they are holding themselves up as supporting Free Software philosophies (as opposed to Open Source), so where’s the pretense?
If somehow it ever makes strategic sense for them to stop making use of the open source model, yeah, they’ll stop. That doesn’t mean they were pretending.
I don’t think they’re pretending. Open source software is a valuable resource for basically all major tech companies, and a lot of it is driven by major tech companies. Some kind of combination of open source and proprietary software will always be a thing for them. This isn’t some major contradiction, they use either model based on the specific needs of the project.
This is why some think “Open Source” is too permissive since they see it as free/cheap labor to be exploited by huge corporations.
I’m not sure that I see it that way, but I can see their point.
deleted by creator
There is no practical reason to “do better.” It’s fine.
Eh, I’d give him a poke.
I think you’re right, since a website like SteamHistory is definitely not going to bother establishing a representative in an EU state the only recourse would be to try to go through the US legal system and it’s far from clear to me how that would go. GDPR seems like it was written with actual businesses in mind, but SteamHistory isn’t exactly that. I think a business would want to comply or lose access to a valuable market, but there’s less leverage on a (seemingly) privately run web site.
Was this GPT4?
Nothing.
Take that, India! 😎
It is.
The people in charge of maintaining Mastodon in particular though need to establish some kind of legal entity and that needs legal recognition somewhere.
China makes those, too.
A dongle is a solution to the problem “I want to use my headphones with a device with only a USB-C port.”
I really like my Bolt, it perfectly suits my needs and I love driving it. I think the biggest compromise that makes it unattractive for long distance travel is the relatively slow charging speed. I very rarely do that, however, and if I did I might rent a different vehicle.
I think the sign in the photo still makes sense if you interpret it as “Don’t park here unless you’re using the Tesla charging station.”
I agree