I expect that for posts but not for votes. Inherently, we don’t want our votes to be public - that kind of defeat the purpose.
I expect that for posts but not for votes. Inherently, we don’t want our votes to be public - that kind of defeat the purpose.
Lemmy is already a privacy nightmare, in some way. There was a comment showing the screengrab of those peiple who upvoted and downvoted a post. Basically, if you self-host an instance, you’ll have access to these. This can easily be weaponized by certain organizations that want to create profiling of lemmy users, e.g NSA and Intelligence agencies.
yes, I am one of those who are also getting bored of it. But this doesn’t mean that I am part of the market that they targeted. They might me targeting certain segments or even service providers such as game developers or console makers etc. The technology is still in it advent stage so it is too early to say wether they are going to fail.
Sorry, I disagree with this kind of generalisation. To be rational, Just because you don’t want it, it doesn’t mean everyone else is on the same ship. I am very sure there are certain people who will benefit from this and want it.
I use encfs and sync it to dropbox etc. Then use gopass password manager to store password in the encfs folders. Not fully auto-integrated but good enough for me.
Very unlikely, If you read and refer to the article. The identity was stolen but the pic is a stock photo.
The two images at the top of this story are a stock photo and what KnowBe4 says is the AI fake based on the stock photo.
I am with you. I am baffled when non sequitur comment got more engagements and someone got downvoted for pointing it out.
Quality is not appreciated here, I suppose.
Just stop using YT altogether.
They should but easy to say than done. In the end they will return back to it if no better or at least equal alternatives are out there to fill the vacuum.
the methods used by thiefs to try and get access to your phone data.
It is not about accessing the data but to disassociate the current user from the phone so that the thief can reset the phone or/and it’s components for new users.
no matter our computational techniques, the diminishing returns in predictive precision is reached far sooner than we achieve general intelligence
That’s very bold presumption. How can they be so sure of this, that any future models can’t tackle the issue? have they got proof or something.
you don’t understand, do you? This kind of post is out of place, has ‘attention seeker’ vibe - those that we rarely come across on Lemmy but usually found on Facebook.
Hey, I follow up your suggestion - come back and read the article. No doubt, a very engaging read. Thx.
thx.
thx.
anyone can tldr?
this is better posted at Facebook.
deleted by creator
For me that’s just envy. You define people based on what you don’t get.
Your thinking is so interesting that I need to learn the way you think. Please answer this if you don’t mind: If someone who are good at what they are doing are garbage, how do you define those that are not good at what they are doing?
Bill Gates during the early years, yes. But now, I thought he’s turned 180°.