LOL I should have reread that one.
- 22 Posts
- 159 Comments
The data is not centralized, but everyone is using the same
aggravationaggregation service (indexer) to access the data.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•So, after using Lemmy for 1.5 Years. You are telling I am not even allowed to use Lemmy?English
6·10 months agoNo. All of your direct interactions are with your instance which federates with others.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Kagi search engine now has a Fediverse search option.English
8·11 months agoDon’t trust him based on his prior comments
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Kagi search engine now has a Fediverse search option.English
181·11 months agoI’m not a fan of Kagi’s founder, so I generally don’t use it.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Can we please make a viable (federated!) amazon alternative? I have an idea!English
1·11 months agoRemoved by mod
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Can we please make a viable (federated!) amazon alternative? I have an idea!English
1·11 months agoThey dictate the operations of their suppliers. They force large expansions in capital investment and then decide that they don’t want to renew the supplier relationship before the financing for the capital investments can be paid back. The only way suppliers can hope avoid this is to do what Walmart wants or constantly change their products in often superficial ways with branding agreements for IP of entertainment companies.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Can we please make a viable (federated!) amazon alternative? I have an idea!English
5·11 months agoAmazon doesn’t handle shipping for a lot of the things they sell.
This is false. Very few products sold via Amazon are shipped independently from Amazon’s logistics services.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Can we please make a viable (federated!) amazon alternative? I have an idea!English
1·11 months agono sketchy pricing based on bullwhip procurement.
Walmart’s procurement has been abusive to their suppliers (who often go out of business because of their relationship with Walmart) for decades. I think you may need to reassess your perception of their procurement strategy.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Can we please make a viable (federated!) amazon alternative? I have an idea!English
241·11 months agoYou don’t seem to understand the retail operations of Amazon. They provide logistics and marketing services to retailers, they also directly compete against those retailers because those retailers can’t do better at logistics and marketing without using Amazon’s services.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Now's the time to start talking about Matrix+FediverseEnglish
1·1 year agoI honestly don’t think federated architecture is valuable for a chat room service.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Now's the time to start talking about Matrix+FediverseEnglish
4·1 year agoIf matrix wasn’t so poorly implemented, I’d recommend it.
I dove in to the deepend and found Matrix to be underwhelming and that’s probably generous.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Let's discuss how to efficiently promote Lemmy to potential new joinersEnglish
1·1 year agoThanks for the link.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Let's discuss how to efficiently promote Lemmy to potential new joinersEnglish
21·1 year agoWhy not promote piefed?
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Billionaire-proofing the internet — PluralisticEnglish
6·1 year agoPeople here are satisfied with using the ActivityPub services and content with slow growth of a now sustainable but relatively small user group.
The people who want to use bsky just want a better Twitter. And bsky has delivered that. If that’s temporary, it’s better for them to use it while it lasts because Mastodon is absolutely not what those people using bsky want. Mastodon to them is technically worse than Twitter but something they may settle for if bsky wasn’t an option.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Free Our Feeds: "it will take independent funding and governance to turn Bluesky’s underlying tech—the AT Protocol—into something more powerful than a single app"English
2·1 year agoFederation and decentralization is not what the users of bsky want. It’s (for some) a nice to have thing but way down on the list of what they value.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Friendica/Facebook Alternative DevelopmentEnglish
2·1 year agoI agree with most of what you said, just wanted to let you know that the tone wasn’t optimal for facilitating understanding.
Have a nice weekend.
















The problem I see with this idea is that I have no idea who most people are on “my” instance or what sort of content they’re interested in. Even for a topic based instance like https://startrek.website/, outside of Star Trek, what are the chances that the interests of the members align?
The Lemmy developers were working on making user defined custom feeds. If that ever get implemented, I’d certainly give many ideas a try. But the Lemmy devs don’t have any new feed options on their priority list and I doubt they will anytime soon.
The main dev (only dev?) of piefed seems much more likely to implement new ideas. For example, I had mentioned that only votes from a community’s subscribers should be counted on posts to said community by default with the owner of the community given an option to count all votes. It was implemented within days.