Rollerblades?

Dude, seriously, iCloud backup. What the fuck

What I can imagine is a fair and equitable ecology of media sharing. While some commercial producers - as well and indie ones - would offer their content for free linking (perhaps with a daily/weekly quota), others may work out mass licensing deals with the platform owner. , Even many more others may work out, individualized compensation agreements that fall somewhere in between.

So, FB would pay an annual licensing fee to all of the content producers whose content it profits from.

FB is already built on hundreds of more complex systems that the one required for tracking license payment obligations.

That certainly does sound like a problem for Facebook, and that’s why they told Canada to fuck off and stopped publishing Canadian news.

That doesn’t make it right, and it’s certainly pretty shitty on that part of Facebook, who could easily afford to pay for the content that they make so much money from.

If one company is able to profit from the content/product produced by another, the original company should be fairly compensated. That’s what the law was about, and Facebook decided they didn’t wanna play that game.

Shit like that was the last straw for me and I ended up bailing on Linux for, like, 10 years until I got back into it around 2006.

Up all night, and all you got to see was a boob

Honestly, it sucked. Like most computing at the time. Everything came on a ton of floppy disks, it was impossible to update online unless you had a good connection (which nobody did), and you had to do everything by hand, including compiling a lot of stuff which took forever. I mean, I’m glad I got the experience, but I would never wanna go back to that. It sucked.

Yeah. I remember, lol

Geez, I haven’t heard of someone running Slackware in at least 15 years. I mean, I know it’s still around, I just haven’t heard anyone say they were running it.

Lmao

lol

I always find it funny how close German can sometimes be to English.

Edit: oops, not German

So you admit, there is no reason not to believe what is written in the article, then you posit a strawman argument in the attempt to validate the point you already admitted was meaningless.

How is this anything other than an absurd amount of bias?

What evidence do you have for that? If you’re going to call the writer of this article a liar, you should back that up with proof.

OK… You’ve listed an apparent amount of expertise in the subject matter under discussion, but you stopped short of offering your opinion. Excuse me if I’m a little confused.

This is a big step. I hope other technology companies try to aim for something similar and actually meet their goals.

Well, that put a smile on my face