That’s “Les bians” for you.

Never forget to pluralize the nouns if the article is plural. 😛

Debian’s a Debian, but they call it Le Debian.

Would the Mayans agree?

That would be for North America,
but I disagree considering where the name America likely came from,
not Albericus Vespucci, but from a Mayan mountainous region named Amerrisque,
“land where the wind blows constantly” and perhaps combined with the Spanish word “rica/rich”,
because those mountains were rich with gold at that time.

And I think that name is more fitting than ‘Turtle Island’ to be honest.
North America has a lot of hurricanes and tornadoes.
And it’s rich with resources.

South America needs a rename though.

Liberal is against bigotry of any kind. That’s a core foundation. It supports equality.

The core foundation of liberalism is capitalism.
They are the party of merchants and lawmakers
that rebelled against against the kings and theocrats of their time.

Since the US has just two parties by design, it makes both parties tent parties,
that is to say that there’s multiple parties of different ideologies inside the party.

The way I look at it is that the US democratic party went from
white supremacist to social democratic (Kennedy) to liberal (Clinton).

Republicans are currently dominated by Zion-Anglo male supremacist racists together with other pro-white racists.

Why are you under the impression that only ***pro-***white racist are alt right and all other kinds are liberals?

Because most other kinds are being suppressed by the pro-white racists, so they’re not going to join the Republican party.
One of the few that still joins forces with the Republicans, for example Zionists or Falun Dafa, assume that they can rule over them.

You can hate whites. Mexicans. Jews. Men, etc. Any support of group discrimination is right wing by its definition because liberals specifically is against bigotry.

It’s socialists that are against bigotry.
Liberal are just capitalists.

Explain

Did Russia provide any help to those poor souls? No. Is this what is called “freeing”?

As long as the war continues, any money sent to displaced Ukrainians would end up in the pockets of the corrupt Ukrainian government and be used to buy weapons to attack Russia or to further suppress Russian-Ukrainians.

Usonia

I’m a man and I can tell you this isn’t true.

It’s good poetry though
and there’s certainly a group of women out there loving to hear this,
who will say yes if you ask them if they’re romantic,
unless she’s ‘Summer’ from ‘500 days of Summer’,
because that woman wanted to cite this kind of poetry
to her perfect partner and have him swoon over.

But you’re better off stating this to a romantically inclined woman
than to interpret the poetry and following its lines.

The only things that are not real that people think is real are time and space, especially space.

An illusion is when an object that is thought to have a certain shape,
turning out to have a very different shape and that usually means that
what one thinks it is seeing a solid three-dimensional object, it in reality is
just mere “smoke and mirrors”.

The moment you try and touch the object with your hand, your hand goes right through it.
Now one needs to use objects to create such an illusion, and those objects are real,
it’s the object that’s perceived to be real that isn’t.

Space is not an illusion, but it is misdefined as having the properties of an object
therefore turning something that merely conceptual as something that is real.
Yet even the most prominent scientists of today are too daft to realize this simple thing
and actually think that space is real and define it having dimensions.

And they define it as such: “You can travel through it three-dimensionally,
therefore it has three dimensions.”

While it may look like space has three dimensions, it doesn’t.
It doesn’t the same way mathematics doesn’t have
any place-value notation as a property of mathematics.
Sure, you can use the decimal system in mathematics,
but you based that on the number of fingers you have.
It’s not a property of mathematics, it’s just the preferred system we use.
And the same goes with space. Our body has three dimensions,
therefore we think space does but in reality space has no dimensions.

Dimensions are defined as the limits to where an object stops being.
Your length, height and width are the limits to how much you are.
You are not defined by how much an object can travel through you.

Space is not an aquarium with imaginary glass panes and infinite volume,
that auto-magically get an extra set of panes the moment one of the fish that swim in it
suddenly grows a new set of limbs that protrude into the next dimension.

Space is nothing. It is zero-dimensional as it has no height, no width and no length
and therefore is not real in the same sense that you and me are.
And thought of space having such qualities is the ultimate illusion.

These sound like Russian propaganda talking points.

With that type of poor argumentation I can defeat all your arguments with one full swoop.
Anything you say are now Usonian propaganda talking points.

The simple matter of the fact is that Russia invaded Ukraine wayyy before 4 years ago.

Usonian propaganda talking points

They are simply trying to put the USSR back together and you Ukraine isn’t having it.

Usonian propaganda talking points

Done.

No, this is a response to the mass adoption of systemd by Linux and the Age Verification Law.

It’s GNU philosophy or owning a compromised OS.

Bad.

Linux will become the new compromised OS
not far removed from Android,
while GNU Hurd will become the new Linux.

[edit]

Go ahead and vote me down!
It doesn’t change the way Ubuntu and Systemd have operated.

Abraham Lincoln also “murdered his own people”,
The differences are

1. The Soviet Union was never a safe haven
   for fascists and other right-wing extremists,
   so no slave owners fled over there to claim
   that Lincoln “destroyed their family business forever”.

2. The Soviet Union never paraded US Afro-nationalists that would make claim that since they’re oppressed,
   that the lack of population growth of Afro-Americans
   compared to Euro-Americans,
   should be counted of dead Afro-nationalist victims at the hands
   of Abraham Lincoln and other US presidents.

3. Like every US president,
   Abraham Lincoln oppressed the indigenous people of the US,
   which I #will count as ‘own people’ and that equals at least 300 million people,
   because that’s what the population would have been if they hadn’t been viciously
   and brutally murdered at the hands of the Usonians during US history.

They are freeing Russian-Ukrainians in Ukraine.
Those have been suffering for 12 years.

Ukraine had a coup and the new leader decided to oppress the Russian-Ukrainians.
Zelensky presented himself as a peace candidate opposing the warmongering corrupt government,
but did the opposite once in power.

Large parts of Russia have been given to Ukraine in the past during the Soviet times,
ironically to prevent invasion of both Russia and Ukraine from Western powers.
Russia wants those areas back and those areas want Russia back.
The Russian-Ukrainians in Donetsk and Lugansk Oblasts
tried doing an independence referendum before the war,
but were shot and killed at the polling station.

incredible. using the arrest of two canadian spies (yes, we know they’re spies, otherwise the canadian govt would never have paid them millions in a settlement when they got back to canada) as proof that chinese police are monsters.

On top of that using the Hong Kong the riots where rioters decided to kill and maim their police and then demanded not to be prosecuted because they wanted complete immunity for their vandalism as they wanted to spite their government for a law introduced to jail a murderer of a young Taiwanese woman because the ugly young man couldn’t handle a breakup. Not because they thought the murderer was innocent, but because they despised the fact that the vast majority of today’s immigrants from mainland China that arrive in Hong Kong do not see them themselves as refugees like a generation before, but as equals or more in touch with their homeland than the isolated Anglo-Americanized Hong Kongers who saw themselves as elevated above the rest of China and a lot of these newcomers started to work as government officials like the police or railway, which is why they also kept setting metro stations on fire.

• Oppression of Uyghur ISIS terrorist members.
• Liberation of British-colonized Tibet, run by a local theocrat that enslaved most of its people and by enslaved I mean they had officially been designated as serfs to the state, as human property of the clergy, by law.
• You can’t annex your own country, but what you can do is support an expelled far-right party of a country that kills the indigenous people of an island and pretend that these murderers are somehow the victims.
• The Tiananmen square insurgency was a CIA-backed coup attempt where the insurgents murdered 100+ Chinese army choir soldiers that were on their way to the square to sing out the protesters off the square.

Go on…

Liberals are not conservative. They are against misogyny, bigotry,racism.

So right-wing Female supremacists, Trans supremacists and Afro-supremacists.
That’s your problem there.

If all of them are complacent with rampant problems in liberal democracies like:

• Campaign fraud
• Worker exploitation
• Imperialist propaganda
• Bribes
• Blackmail
• Inside trading
• Usury
• Private gambling institutions
• Landlords
• Consumer good poisoning
• Monopolized rent consumer goods

Then THEY’RE NOT LEFT-WING!

And the US hasn’t had a left-wing party, not even a social democratic one, since the 1990s,
as social democratic parties only seem to thrive if there’s a socialist nation to look up to
and the Soviet Union fell apart as it lacked resources (coal) to do anything against the US petrodollar scheme,
That’s why Bill Clinton had been called a Repubic-lite during his reign
and Obama never delivered on his “Hope & Change”.

The only semi-left-wing ideas I see coming from US contemporaries “progressives”,
is that they’re pro-green, because that at least will help people have the resources to go left in the future.

The right stands for a ruling merchant class and a gatekeeping judicial class.
The judicial class has noble ideas for itself as a ruling class,
but they need campaign money in order to be elected as a ruler,
which the merchant class has in spades, but want their favorable laws for them to be implemented in return.
And thus the merchant class becomes the ruling class and the judicial class their gatekeepers.
That’s what the right-wing stands for, unless they’re even more regressive
and long for a kings and priests to rule over them.

Centrists, social democratic wing like FDR, try to curb the power of the merchant class,
but a true left wing will replace it with a ruling engineering class and gatekeeping scholar class that will replace liberal democracy with a people’s democracy that can focus on creating a classless society,
because only a people’s democracy can tackle the issue of campaign fraud,
which is systemic in a liberal democracy.
And this systemic problem becomes larger and larger the more a society automates
as it causes the power of merchants to be more and more concentrated.

The US democratic party is only slowly returning to become a social democratic party
with Zohran Mamdami firmly in the democratic socialist side.

But looking from the outside, the US is like the Star Control II Ur-Quan alien race, where the US democratic party plays the role of the Kzer-za that wants the rest of the world/galaxy enslaved and the US republican party playing the role of the bloodthirsty Kohr-Ah that wants the rest of the world dead. The only thing missing in the US is a civil war between the two.

Wouldn’t the quiet geek engineer be Richard Stallman?

The better question asked is:

How do they explain to you that they don’t?