- 0 Posts
- 39 Comments
F/a-18 taking off from a carrier, here’s the original image…
It’s possibly an f/a-18, the tail looks like a V and the engines are closer together like in the picture.
I think it might be an f/a-18 actually, vertical stabilisers are more slanted in a V and the engines are closer together than on an f-14
EDIT: found the original image
We’re looking at a rear view of a fighter with a V tail…
Yeah I could definitely see this for slo-mo and data recording in an actual laboratory setting that requires it to be as accurate as humanly possible. Idk if this is a standard though I’m not a scientist.
Wow… I’ve worked in the fast food industry for 2 years, and that really hits close to home. With the kitchen display systems and headsets, with modern technology it would be easy to implement that… very easy. We’d still need one manager on the line for de-escalating angry customers but that would end up essentially the same as the book synopsis described. And the subsequent dystopia… I could literally see this occurring tomorrow. Kinda scary.
The “traditional” story (the one that “seems most likely” because we don’t really know) is that some kids were playing with discarded warped glass at a glassmaker’s shop and ended up with a magnifying glass or rudimentary telescope. Enter the simultaneous invention of the telescope in multiple places (very likely it wasn’t any one person in particular), Galileo starts using it for scientific stuff, now they’re making lenses on purpose. Old nearsighted lensemaker looks through it, maybe some charts or a book on the table, all of a sudden they can see well. Attach to frame. Glasses.
In heinzsight, it should’ve been obvious…
Jigga deez nuts!
Like 70% of the world, idk about them but in my case it’s the American South…
31·4 months agoEvaporation isn’t the breakdown of 2(H2O) --> 2(H2) + O2 (hydrogen and oxygen) like electrolysis… It’s just water molecules overcoming the intermolecular force and not wanting to be liquid anymore, H2O(l) --> H2O(g), still just water and sadly no good as a fuel.
The movies get silencers very wrong… It would be a bit louder than the acorn and sound much different (or about the same volume if the vehicle is really well soundproofed). The officer should have known immediately that it wasn’t from inside the car. If it was a downtown area where stray bullets are an actual threat, I might have gotten down and scanned the area for danger, maybe radioed the possible stray bullet and assessed vehicle damage after a couple minutes. And that’s just common sense, I have no real training whatsoever. But literally any kid who’s gone squirrel hunting knows better trigger discipline than that.
Agreed. While a sniper round with a silencer or stray bullet from a streetfight hitting the hood of the car might sound similar, there’s no way it could have been any firearm from inside the vehicle. A paranoid but well-trained cop getting down behind the engine block and visually scanning the area for danger? Understandable, but a bit silly unless you’re in a dangerous downtown area. But emptying your mag into the car? You can’t have people with firearms that poorly trained and that jumpy… I say if they must have guns (which could be necessary in the case of an actual armed criminal), send them to bootcamp and have the army drill some threat assessment and trigger discipline into them…
Or maybe someone just thinks it looks good and would rather not show their bedroom to the entire conference…? And that’s a problem… Why? Because you think the inside of their bedroom is everyone’s business and they’re mentally unwell for being more comfortable with a blurred background?
Please refrain from sharing your opinions when the only contents thereof are hate towards another individual for something which helps that individual feel more comfortable while effecting absolutely no one in any way whatsoever…
13·5 months agoExactly. People even stream on their actual PC desktops? Just use a VM or at least a separate login, duh
46 72 6F 6D 20 74 68 65 20 6D 6F 6D 65 6E 74 20 49 20 75 6E 64 65 72 73 74 6F 6F 64 20 74 68 65 20 77 65 61 6B 6E 65 73 73 20 6F 66 20 6D 79 20 66 6C 65 73 68 2C 20 69 74 20 64 69 73 67 75 73 74 65 64 20 6D 65 2E 20 49 20 63 72 61 76 65 64 20 74 68 65 20 73 74 72 65 6E 67 74 68 20 61 6E 64 20 63 65 72 74 61 69 6E 74 79 20 6F 66 20 73 74 65 65 6C 2E 20 49 20 61 73 70 69 72 65 64 20 74 6F 20 74 68 65 20 70 75 72 69 74 79 20 6F 66 20 74 68 65 20 42 6C 65 73 73 65 64 20 4D 61 63 68 69 6E 65 2E 20 59 6F 75 72 20 6B 69 6E 64 20 63 6C 69 6E 67 20 74 6F 20 79 6F 75 72 20 66 6C 65 73 68 2C 20 61 73 20 74 68 6F 75 67 68 20 69 74 20 77 69 6C 6C 20 6E 6F 74 20 64 65 63 61 79 20 61 6E 64 20 66 61 69 6C 20 79 6F 75 2E 20 4F 6E 65 20 64 61 79 20 74 68 65 20 63 72 75 64 65 20 62 69 6F 6D 61 73 73 20 79 6F 75 20 63 61 6C 6C 20 74 68 65 20 74 65 6D 70 6C 65 20 77 69 6C 6C 20 77 69 74 68 65 72 2C 20 61 6E 64 20 79 6F 75 20 77 69 6C 6C 20 62 65 67 20 6D 79 20 6B 69 6E 64 20 74 6F 20 73 61 76 65 20 79 6F 75 2E 20 42 75 74 20 49 20 61 6D 20 61 6C 72 65 61 64 79 20 73 61 76 65 64 2C 20 66 6F 72 20 74 68 65 20 4D 61 63 68 69 6E 65 20 69 73 20 69 6D 6D 6F 72 74 61 6C 2026 20 45 76 65 6E 20 69 6E 20 64 65 61 74 68 20 49 20 73 65 72 76 65 20 74 68 65 20 4F 6D 6E 69 73 73 69 61 68 2E
But there shouldn’t be an apostrophe there… it’s = it is, its = posessive.