Think a bit before you talk. Hard for all of us!

This article is annoyingly one-sided. The tool performs an act of synthesis just like an art student looking at a bunch of art might. Sure, like an art student, it could copy someone’s style or even an exact image if asked (though those asking may be better served by torrent sites). But that’s not how most people use these tools. People create novel things with these tools and should be protected under the law.

But why?

I bet its two users are both very sad

Good to have a reality check, but this is still better than what we had before