I think the point, though, is there should be a redundant system to handle failures, like a mechanical-only door handle.
Another example: your dashboard touchscreen fails, there should still be a button to turn on the AC. Or off. Whatever makes this analogous to the safety concern about doors.
I know a few people who have become more anti green because of JSO,
And you let them? What kind of limp-dick shit is this.
How does it “understand the strategic aspects of the game really well” if it can’t solve problems it hasn’t seen the answers to?
I think the definition is “whichever is more emotionally important to you.” So, in your case, they would be very, very intelligent.
The Turing test is flawed, because while it is supposed to test for intelligence it really just tests for a convincing fake.
This is just conjecture, but I assume this is because the question of consciousness is not really falsifiable, so you just kind of have to draw an arbitrary line somewhere.
Like, maybe tech gets so good that we really can’t tell the difference, and only god knows it isn’t really alive. But then, how would we know not to give the machine legal rights?
For the record, ChatGPT does not pass the turing test.
When games that are losses for the AI from humans are included, the bug is fixed.
You’re not grasping the fundamental problem here.
This is like saying a calculator understands math because when you plug in the right functions, you get the right answers.
xD God damn that was funny.
Like how many, five?
This is literally what these walled gardens depend on. Why are mocking people for it?
Just change cities, “but my friends live here.”
Just leave the cult, “but the cult separated me from all my other friends.”
Like, yeah. Cult’s do this on purpose to keep people locked in.
What the fuck is this self-important bullshit.
Dude, if you want to kill her, fine, whatever, but we’re putting your ass in prison.
its a 45 minute walk to the nearest train station,
Yeah, this is a really, really, really big problem with designing society for cars. Tons of people live in suburbia, with no mixed zoning, where they’re a 2 hour walk from their nearest church, a 4 hour walk if they want a coffee; and so like you say, driving becomes their only option. It’s the only thing they can do, realistically. And if they ever lose their car somehow, uh, say hello to poverty. Good luck getting a job at that coffee shop 4 hours away.
In situations where someone who lives very far from a city is visiting someone else very far, cars probably still make some sense. In the OP picture example, though, that is a prime candidate for transit refactoring. The presence of cars there is actually hurting them.
Okay, Mom.
If not, that would indicate that this newfangled self-driving is more dangerous than a little ol’ “caught in the stone-age” Nissan Leaf, wouldn’t it?
If their level of self-driving is so new and revolutionary, maybe it should be kept in the oven to bake a little longer.
Oh, that’s right, this was 2014.
In this case, they’re referring to the P.T. video game. It was cool as shit, but good luck getting a copy to play. :p
“Immutable” in a mathematical sense probably isn’t true, yeah.
I imagine people forget that biology and evolution will do literally anything that doesn’t not work. And the whole male/female thing isn’t really a fundamental truth, it’s just a really popular answer.
I know, I know, it’s so ridiculous. I can’t believe these are my actual beliefs without any nuance whatsoever.
If that helps you not to think about anything being said, sure.
Out of curiosity, what do you think a hate group does with information on their particular bogeyman?
“I won’t allow some lady to tarnish my image!”
“I will do it my self!”
None of those things replace that content, though.
Look, I dunno if this is legally a copyrights issue, but as a society, I think a lot of people have decided they’re willing to yield to social media and search engine indexers, but not to AI training, you know? The same way I might consent to eating a mango but not a banana.