• HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    many people don’t have have it easy now, including black people. Hippie was a thing, yuppie was a thing, reagan democrats were a thing, Xers not trying in the system was a thing. tic toc is a thing. these were popular among certain groups of people at certain times and define generations. there is no hard or soft cutoff is true and its all approximation and class is far more defining than anything else no matter where you feel (if you actually realize the class your in). Its not completely arbitrary though

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      It’s completely arbitrary, especially towards the edges of the time period. A boomer born 1946 had a wildly different life than a boomer born 1964, and a boomer born in 1964 has way more in common with a Gen Xer born in 1965.

      Age cohorts are real, but “generations” are just arbitrary groupings.

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        yeah I mentioned the same about with the hard/soft cutoffs but generations are as much a thing as nationalities. its a shared experience and trends and such. I laugh because I live near my high school and they have these boards on the fence with all these awards and accomplishments for teams and clubs over the years but there is a big gap for the 80’s and 90’s. My generation representing.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Nationalities at least have a basis in actually existing nations. There’s literally no basis for generations.

          Age cohorts exist. People born the same year have stuff in common. Generations aren’t like that, they’re just arbitrarily defined over arbitrary time spans.