• surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    There is a correlative link between the willingness to hurt animals and psychopathy. You start out hiring animals and you are more likely to be okay hurting humans.

    If people are going to choose to eat meat, then I would prefer that they are protected from the trauma that comes with animal killing.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is a correlative link between the willingness to hurt animals and psychopathy.

      I think you’re conflating hunting with torturing animals for entertainment…

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Lol, I’m sure you do… you’re just being purposely obtuse. Hunters do not hunt with intent to cause undue suffering to animals. With the animal harm associated with psychopathy the suffering is the express intent of the harm, not a byproduct of it.

          If hunting was actually correlated with psychopathy then we’d be in a bit of a pickle, considering that we evolved from hunting and gathering societies.

          • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Hmm … maybe you’re right in that it’s a matter of degrees. To me, there’s a minimum amount of empathy that people should have, and below that I think they’re crazy. So yes, psychopaths are probably more crazy than hunters. I can see that making sense.

            To me, it still takes a crazy mind to look at a breathing mammal and straight up murder it. More so the more intelligent it is.

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Hmm … maybe you’re right in that it’s a matter of degrees. To me, there’s a minimum amount of empathy that people should have, and below that I think they’re crazy.

              Psychology is not really a hard science, there is no real minimum or maximum requirements needed for a diagnosis. It’s all subjective to how a patient interacts and behaves compared to the social normative.

              To me, it still takes a crazy mind to look at a breathing mammal and straight up murder it.

              Eh, I guess it just depends on your ethical construct. I’m mostly a vegetarian because of environmental reasons, that and I think that industrialized farming is morally abhorrent. I would much rather hunt, kill, and consume a deer than go to a Wendy’s. There’s a lot less suffering involved in virtually all hunting than just about any industrialized farm.

    • vala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Distancing yourself from the violence doesn’t make you less complicit in the violence.

      Eating animals inherently requires a willingness to harm animals. You can either ignore it or you can’t.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not talking about being complicit. I’m talking about exposure.

        Just like you’re not exposed to the child slavery that makes your cell phone possible, and that’s good for your psyche.

        But if you don’t like that, be vegetarian.

        • vala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Most people cope like you are here but it’s honestly weird to see someone who is seemingly so self aware but also encourages this ignorance.

          Remaining ignorant of these problems doesn’t make them go away or make anyone any less complicit in perpetuating them.

          It’s worth considering that it’s possible to eat without harming animals and it’s possible to have a cell phone without child slavery.

          Just like you’re not exposed to the child slavery that makes your cell phone possible, and that’s good for your psyche.

          Not knowing at all is one thing. Choosing to be willfully ignorant is another.

          But if you don’t like that, be vegetarian.

          Yeah I agree.

          • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            It’s not so much that I’m encouraging ignorance. I’m discouraging direct exposure.

            You can know and be fully aware that animals are being killed. But to see it happen with your own eyes, or to participate, will fuck up a person.

            I guess I would encourage direct exposure if I thought more people would end up being vegetarian. But my gut tells me that more people would just end up crazy.

    • Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      From the totally opposite side of this. I think that people should be required to kill and butcher an animal at least once if they’re going to eat meat.

      That would quickly end factory farming, which needs to be abolished anyhow. We’d have a lot more vegans.

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      If that’s the side you’re coming from then I guess I can understand your argument. I was thinking from an animal welfare perspective, and the argument (which I’ve seen made before) that hunting is inhumane and that people should get their meat at the store instead.

      As a side-note, I would really like a link to something backing up that people who hunt for food are more likely to be psychopaths.

        • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Holy false equivalency Batman. There is a vast difference between hunting and torturing animals. It is a case where intent and what that one approaches the task has a substantial bearing on the individual’s likelihood of anti-social personality disorder. An ethical hunter shows respect to the animal that they kill by doing their best to minimize suffering (this includes things like choice of weapon as well as ensuring that any game that they shoot it’s tracked down so that they didn’t suffer needlessly).

          Do some people with anti-social personality disorder hunt? Yes. Some of them also eat at Wendy’s. You sound like you’re trying to invent a way to make yourself “better than” a large swath of people. I’d suggest that you practice some self-reflection.

          I say this as someone who does not hunt but previously worked on a small poultry farm where I had to slaughter as well as euthanize animals. I’ve seen what good and bad quality of life does to animals. Ignoring the plight of factory farmed animals does not make you a better person.