• Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            26 days ago

            I guess there was a miss-understanding.

            What I meant was this:

            He has either control over content that is published by an entity (like e.g. a network) or he dismantles it.

            Or do you disagree to that too?

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        Oh I forgot the Blue MAGA mantra: “anything the opposition does is automatically bad”
        When they say water is wet you have to deny it.
        Really you all deserve Trump

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          25 days ago

          Get over yourself. All I did was state a fact that was contradictory to the previous comment. I didn’t even say anything about whether it was good or bad. Trump is trying to cut VoA.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      26 days ago

      Wrong. It opposed Naziism and Soviet Union misinformation. Since then it’s been a standard journalism outlet that, by law, could not be dictated by US politicians.

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        26 days ago

        Thanks CIA operative, it is no secret it has always been a propaganda outlet from your CIA bosses trying to stir up shit in countries they don’t control.
        And the US has never been against nazis, supported them plenty of times before during and after WW2.