• MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Not to mention the obvious fact that a position of, “rule enforcer”, even where necessary like like tracking down and imprisoning a murderer, needn’t be a permanent role given to people that can then abuse others with that authority.

    Anarchism doesn’t mean zero authority. It means no unjustified authority.

    • ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Since writing that last comment I have that funny thought of a diplomacy lottery in my head where it’s randomly decided who will join a trained diplomat or experts on state visits to represent the people. “… And this year… Dale will visit the environmental summit with our experts in …” followed by an AMA where Dale can share their impressions. I’d love it ;D

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        “I learned that it’s just a retreat for rich fucks to suck themselves off and pretend like they’re saving the world while changing nothing for the better.”

    • finitebanjo@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      If no permanent rules are in place then those temporary role enforcers will just enforce whatever rules they want. Like the splicers are doing by harvesting your delicious liver.